Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban for Pediatric Patients Requiring Anticoagulation for Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: In children, the incidence of VTE was initially reported to be very low at 0.07-0.14 per 10,000 children; however, contemporary data revealed a higher incidence for hospitalized children: ≥ 106 per 10,000 admissions (Andrew M et al. Blood 1994;83:1251-7, van Ommen CH et al. J Pediatr 2001;139:676-81, O'Brien SH et al. Pediatrics 2022;149:e2021054649). Pediatric evidence-based VTE treatment guidelines recommend unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) as standard of care (SOC), acknowledging the gap surrounding the use of direct oral anticoagulants, such as apixaban, in children (Monagle P et al. Chest 2012;141[suppl 2]:e737S-e801S, Monagle P et al. Blood Adv 2018;2:3292-3316). The safety and efficacy profile of apixaban in adults with VTE has been established (Agnelli G et al. N Engl J Med 2013;368:699-708 and 2013;369:799-808). This study assessed the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of apixaban in pediatric patients (pts) requiring anticoagulation for the treatment of VTE. Methods: In this 12-week, open-label, active-controlled descriptive study (NCT02464969), pediatric pts (aged < 18 years) with image-confirmed VTE were randomized 2:1 to receive apixaban dosed according to a fixed-dose, body weight tiered (mg/kg) regimen by age group (birth to 27 days, 28 days to < 2 years, 2 to < 12 years, 12 to < 18 years), or SOC prescribed per local practice (VKA, LMWH, and UFH). The primary efficacy endpoint was image-confirmed and adjudicated recurrent VTE defined as contiguous progression or non-contiguous new thrombus (new), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), other thrombosis, paradoxical embolism, and VTE-related mortality. The primary safety endpoint was adjudicated major bleeding and clinically-relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). Secondary endpoints included new or recurrent symptomatic/asymptomatic DVT, PE, VTE other than DVT or PE, stroke, index event status, minor bleeding events, and apixaban PK/PD (plasma concentration and anti-Factor Xa activity [AXA] of apixaban). Pts who discontinued anticoagulation completed end-of-treatment and safety visits. The study was not powered and used descriptive statistics. Results: Overall, 229 pts were randomized (full analysis set: apixaban n = 155, SOC n = 74). In total, 26 pts (11.4%) discontinued treatment (apixaban n = 17, SOC n = 9) and 4 (1.7%) were not treated (apixaban n = 3, SOC n = 1). The majority of pts were female (55.9%) and White (76.4%); median (range) age was 14.2 (0.04-18.0) years. Baseline demographics were comparable between treatment arms. Primary efficacy endpoint: in the apixaban group, 4 (2.6%, 95% CI 0.8-6.7) pts had ≥ 1 symptomatic or asymptomatic recurrent VTE event compared with 2 (2.7%, 95% CI 0.2-9.9) pts in the SOC group; no pts had VTE-related death. Primary safety endpoint: no pts in either treatment group had major bleeding events. In the apixaban group, 2 (1.3%, 95% CI 0.1-5.0) pts had CRNMB compared with 1 (1.4%, 95% CI 0.0-8.1) in the SOC group. The overall safety profile of apixaban was similar to SOC based on the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. No clinically meaningful treatment differences in hematology and clinical chemistry laboratory parameters were observed. Day 14 pre-dose and corresponding post-dose median apixaban concentrations were similar across age groups at the administered doses. AXA was linearly correlated to apixaban concentrations across all age groups and body-weight tiers. Conclusions: In this active-controlled descriptive study in children from birth to < 18 years of age with acute VTE, treatment with apixaban resulted in a low risk of VTE recurrence and comparable risk of major and CRNMB events compared to SOC therapy. No new safety signals were observed in apixaban-treated pts. The safety profile was generally consistent with that reported in adult VTE studies. PK/PD findings demonstrated linear correlation and were consistent across age and body-weight tiers. Study support: This study was sponsored by Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb. Acknowledgments: We thank the Study B0661037 investigators and patients for their participation. Editorial and medical writing support were provided by Caudex, a division of IPG Health Medical Communications, New York, NY, USA, and were funded by Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".