MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405042905 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-200300

Pharmacodynamic Signatures and Correlatives of Response in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Treated with Talquetamab or Teclistamab Plus Daratumumab and Pomalidomide

2024· article· en· W4405042905 sur OpenAlexaff
Deeksha Vishwamitra, Sheri Skerget, Diana S. Cortes, Kalpana Bakshi, Lien Vandenberk, Weili Sun, Jaszianne Tolbert, Colleen Kane, Hein Ludlage, Bas D. Koster, Julie S. Larsen, Tobias Kampfenkel, Ching Li, Farheen Zishan, Thomas J. Prior, Luciano J. Costa, Jesús G. Berdeja, Cyrille Touzeau, Aurore Perrot, Emma Searle, Jeffrey Matous, Ajai Chari, Donna Reece, Manisha Bhutani, Bhagirathbhai Dholaria, Anita D’Souza, Thomas G. Martin, John T. McKay, Alfred L. Garfall, Amrita Krishnan, Niels W.C.J. van de Donk, Nizar J. Bahlis, Ricardo M. Attar

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversity of CalgaryPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesKite PharmaAdaptive BiotechnologiesRegeneron PharmaceuticalsJanssen PharmaceuticalsGenentechCelgeneBristol-Myers SquibbGlaxoSmithKlineServierAmgen
Mots-clésDaratumumabPomalidomideMedicineMultiple myelomaLenalidomideInternal medicineRefractory (planetary science)OncologyPharmacodynamicsBiologyPharmacokinetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: First-in-class bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) like talquetamab (tal; targeting G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D) have shown deep, durable responses in RRMM. Targeting multiple epitopes with combination therapies may enhance antimyeloma activity. The anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab (D) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) such as pomalidomide (P) are known to augment T-cell activity. D exhibits direct antitumor cytotoxicity, increases T-cell recruitment, and depletes CD38 immunoregulatory cells; P upregulates CD38 expression and increases natural killer (NK)-cell activity. We assessed immunologic pharmacodynamic profiles, correlatives of response, and associations with outcomes in patients (pts) treated with tal-DP from TRIMM-2 (NCT04108195) to better understand the potential of this regimen. Methods: Eligible pts had ≥3 prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and IMiD, or were double refractory to a PI and IMiD. Pts received tal 0.4 mg/kg weekly (QW) or 0.8 mg/kg biweekly (Q2W) with step-up dosing and approved schedules of D 1800 mg and P 2 mg. Peripheral blood samples collected at baseline (BL) and on treatment were analyzed by flow cytometry. Max-fold change was calculated per pt using the highest fold change relative to BL or cycle (C) 2 day 1 (when P was added to tal-D). Correlations with progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), and best response groups (complete response [CR]/stringent CR [sCR], partial response [PR]/very good PR [VGPR], and stable disease [SD]/progressive disease [PD]) were performed. Results: Samples from 77 pts in TRIMM-2 were analyzed (tal QW, n=18; tal Q2W, n=59; CR/sCR, n=37; VGPR/PR, n=24; and SD/PD, n=6). Tal-D showed complementary pharmacodynamic effects, including T-cell margination, increased absolute T-cell recovery, expanded effector memory, and decreased naive-CD8 T cells during the first C, which were enhanced after addition of P in C2. While D treatment led to an initial reduction in CD38+ CD8 T cells, addition of tal transiently induced activation of this subset despite concurrent D dosing. After P administration, reinduction of CD38 on CD8 T cells was observed, indicating T-cell restimulation. D reduced immunosuppressive CD38+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), and addition of P rescued NK cells reduced by D. A subgroup analysis showed a pronounced impact of tal-DP on pts with prior BsAb exposure. Although a more dysfunctional, exhausted T-cell phenotype at BL was identified in these pts, tal-DP led to greater CD8 T-cell expansion, NK-cell recovery, CD38+ T-cell activation, and reduction of CD38+ Tregs vs pts without prior BsAb exposure. BL response signatures showed higher CD8 T-cell counts and lower expression of T-cell activation/coinhibitory receptor expression on CD8 T cells (CD38, PD-1/LAG-3, and PD-1/TIM-3) in pts with deeper responses that also demonstrated trends associated with improved PFS and DOR. Longitudinal correlative analyses showed greater, earlier recovery of absolute CD8 T cells in deeper responders to tal-DP that correlated with longer PFS and DOR, particularly following addition of P. NK-cell reduction was comparable across all response groups after tal-D; however, pts with deep responses exhibited NK-cell recovery after P was added, which was not evident in pts with less deep or no responses. Although D addition initially reduced CD38+ CD8 T cells, pts with deeper responses showed greater induction of CD38+ CD8 T-cell activation after addition of tal, which was sustained following P administration; in contrast, nonresponding pts displayed a shorter reactivation of CD38 T cells after P. Higher max-fold change in absolute NK-cell counts and CD38+ CD8 T cells showed trends toward improved PFS and DOR, notably in C2 after the addition of P. Finally, less persistent expression of coinhibitory receptors on CD8 T cells was observed in pts with deep responses, while a reduction in CD38+ Tregs was seen in all pts with tal-DP. Preliminary results with teclistamab (tec)-DP show comparable results to tal-DP, and further analyses are ongoing. Conclusions: Tal-DP exhibits a deep, long-term impact on efficacy through complementary mechanisms of action and may be especially beneficial in pts with prior BsAb exposure, who typically have unfavorable BL immune profiles. Ongoing analyses of tec-DP from MajesTEC-2 (NCT04722146) will be presented.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,267
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→