Descriptive Characterization of Bleeding Events in Participants with Severe Hemophilia Α or B without Inhibitors, Receiving Prophylactic Marstacimab Treatment
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Marstacimab is a monoclonal antibody targeted to the K2 domain of tissue factor pathway inhibitor to reduce inhibition of the extrinsic coagulation pathway and rebalance hemostasis independently of factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) activity. Previous phase 1 and 2 studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) marstacimab prophylaxis up to 450 mg once weekly (QW) to reduce bleeding events in adults with hemophilia A (HA) or hemophilia B (HB), with or without inhibitors. The ongoing pivotal phase 3 BASIS study (NCT03938792) demonstrated 150 mg SC QW marstacimab was effective in reducing treated bleeds vs prior on-demand (OD) or routine prophylaxis (RP) therapy in participants (pts) with severe HA (FVIII <1%) or moderately severe to severe HB (FIX ≤2%) without inhibitors. Contemporary hemophilia trials typically report treated bleeding events as the primary endpoint to determine the efficacy of prophylactic treatment. As such, untreated bleeding episodes are often underreported. It is important to consider both treated and untreated bleeding events to understand overall bleed management. We describe the characteristics of treated and untreated bleeding events in the BASIS study. Methods: BASIS enrolled male pts aged ≥12 to ˂75 years with severe HA or moderately severe to severe HB, with or without inhibitors. Results are reported for the non-inhibitor cohort; the inhibitor cohort is ongoing. Pts entered a 6-month observational phase (OP) and received their prescribed factor replacement therapy (OD or RP) before crossing over to the 12-month active treatment phase (ATP) to receive a single loading dose of 300 mg marstacimab (2x150 mg SC) followed by 150 mg SC QW. The incidence of bleeding episodes, including etiology (spontaneous, traumatic, or procedural), location (joint or soft tissue/muscle), and whether treatment was required (intravenous coagulation factor products or bypass agents) were obtained from pt diaries and medical records. Bleed data were collected over 6 months for the OP phase and 12 months for the ATP phase. Descriptive data are presented. Results: In total, 128 pts (median age 30 [range 13-66] years) entered the 6-month OP (n: OD: HA 29, HB 8; RP: HA 72, HB 19) and 116 (n: OD 33, RP 83) continued to the 12-month ATP. At baseline, 89 (69.5%) pts (OD: n=36; RP: n=53) had ≥1 target joint. The mean (range) duration of marstacimab treatment was 12.1 (11.5-13.1) months for the OD group and 11.6 (0.9-12.8) months for RP group. Of 116 pts, 88 (75.9%; OD 33 [100%], RP 55 [66.3%]) experienced ≥1 bleeding event during the 6-month OP and 85 (73.3%; OD 29 [87.9%], RP 56 [67.5%]) during the 12-month ATP. The total number of bleeding events during the 6-month OP was 1312 (n: OD 899 [68.5%]; RP 413 [31.5%]), of which 1114 (84.9%) were treated (OD 83.3%; RP 88.4%). The total number of bleeding events during the 12-month ATP was 687 (n: OD 243 [35.4%]; RP 444 [64.6%]), of which 504 (73.4%) were treated (OD 48.6%; RP 86.9%). The majority of bleeding episodes were spontaneous in both the OD (OP 83.4%; ATP 77.4%) and RP (OP 72.4%; ATP 70.5%) groups. In both groups, most bleeds occurred in joints (OP: OD 84.0%, RP 62.5%; ATP: OD 82.3%, RP 71.6%) than in soft tissue/muscle (OP: OD 13.0%, RP 32.2%; ATP: OD 13.2%, RP 25.9%). The most common sites of joint bleeds were the ankle/foot, elbow, and knee for both groups in the OP and ATP. Conclusions: The majority of bleeds across both OD and RP groups during the BASIS study (OP and ATP) were spontaneous, treated, and occurred in joints, most commonly the ankle/foot, elbow, and knee. In the OD group, marstacimab prophylaxis resulted in a greater proportion of pts without any bleeding events and a lower proportion with treated bleeds during the ATP vs the OP. Of pts who had bleeding events, the RP group had a relatively greater proportion of treated bleeds (86.9%) vs the OD group (48.6%). Of note, in pts with prior FVIII prophylaxis in the HAVEN-3 emicizumab study who had bleeds, 24% of total bleeds were treated (Callaghan et al, RPTH, 2022), suggesting differences in bleed management vs the BASIS study. Overall, these results demonstrate that a high proportion of bleeding events were treated with factor replacement therapy in the BASIS study, but that clinical management and treatment strategies may differ across trials.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».