MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405043317 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-205975

Descriptive Characterization of Bleeding Events in Participants with Severe Hemophilia Α or B without Inhibitors, Receiving Prophylactic Marstacimab Treatment

2024· article· en· W4405043317 on OpenAlexaff
Davide Matino, Travis J. Gould, John G. Teeter, Carrie Turich Taylor, Regina McDonald, Andrew Palladino

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHemarthrosisFactor IXInternal medicineProphylactic treatmentBleeding diathesisGastroenterologySurgeryPlatelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Marstacimab is a monoclonal antibody targeted to the K2 domain of tissue factor pathway inhibitor to reduce inhibition of the extrinsic coagulation pathway and rebalance hemostasis independently of factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) activity. Previous phase 1 and 2 studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) marstacimab prophylaxis up to 450 mg once weekly (QW) to reduce bleeding events in adults with hemophilia A (HA) or hemophilia B (HB), with or without inhibitors. The ongoing pivotal phase 3 BASIS study (NCT03938792) demonstrated 150 mg SC QW marstacimab was effective in reducing treated bleeds vs prior on-demand (OD) or routine prophylaxis (RP) therapy in participants (pts) with severe HA (FVIII <1%) or moderately severe to severe HB (FIX ≤2%) without inhibitors. Contemporary hemophilia trials typically report treated bleeding events as the primary endpoint to determine the efficacy of prophylactic treatment. As such, untreated bleeding episodes are often underreported. It is important to consider both treated and untreated bleeding events to understand overall bleed management. We describe the characteristics of treated and untreated bleeding events in the BASIS study. Methods: BASIS enrolled male pts aged ≥12 to ˂75 years with severe HA or moderately severe to severe HB, with or without inhibitors. Results are reported for the non-inhibitor cohort; the inhibitor cohort is ongoing. Pts entered a 6-month observational phase (OP) and received their prescribed factor replacement therapy (OD or RP) before crossing over to the 12-month active treatment phase (ATP) to receive a single loading dose of 300 mg marstacimab (2x150 mg SC) followed by 150 mg SC QW. The incidence of bleeding episodes, including etiology (spontaneous, traumatic, or procedural), location (joint or soft tissue/muscle), and whether treatment was required (intravenous coagulation factor products or bypass agents) were obtained from pt diaries and medical records. Bleed data were collected over 6 months for the OP phase and 12 months for the ATP phase. Descriptive data are presented. Results: In total, 128 pts (median age 30 [range 13-66] years) entered the 6-month OP (n: OD: HA 29, HB 8; RP: HA 72, HB 19) and 116 (n: OD 33, RP 83) continued to the 12-month ATP. At baseline, 89 (69.5%) pts (OD: n=36; RP: n=53) had ≥1 target joint. The mean (range) duration of marstacimab treatment was 12.1 (11.5-13.1) months for the OD group and 11.6 (0.9-12.8) months for RP group. Of 116 pts, 88 (75.9%; OD 33 [100%], RP 55 [66.3%]) experienced ≥1 bleeding event during the 6-month OP and 85 (73.3%; OD 29 [87.9%], RP 56 [67.5%]) during the 12-month ATP. The total number of bleeding events during the 6-month OP was 1312 (n: OD 899 [68.5%]; RP 413 [31.5%]), of which 1114 (84.9%) were treated (OD 83.3%; RP 88.4%). The total number of bleeding events during the 12-month ATP was 687 (n: OD 243 [35.4%]; RP 444 [64.6%]), of which 504 (73.4%) were treated (OD 48.6%; RP 86.9%). The majority of bleeding episodes were spontaneous in both the OD (OP 83.4%; ATP 77.4%) and RP (OP 72.4%; ATP 70.5%) groups. In both groups, most bleeds occurred in joints (OP: OD 84.0%, RP 62.5%; ATP: OD 82.3%, RP 71.6%) than in soft tissue/muscle (OP: OD 13.0%, RP 32.2%; ATP: OD 13.2%, RP 25.9%). The most common sites of joint bleeds were the ankle/foot, elbow, and knee for both groups in the OP and ATP. Conclusions: The majority of bleeds across both OD and RP groups during the BASIS study (OP and ATP) were spontaneous, treated, and occurred in joints, most commonly the ankle/foot, elbow, and knee. In the OD group, marstacimab prophylaxis resulted in a greater proportion of pts without any bleeding events and a lower proportion with treated bleeds during the ATP vs the OP. Of pts who had bleeding events, the RP group had a relatively greater proportion of treated bleeds (86.9%) vs the OD group (48.6%). Of note, in pts with prior FVIII prophylaxis in the HAVEN-3 emicizumab study who had bleeds, 24% of total bleeds were treated (Callaghan et al, RPTH, 2022), suggesting differences in bleed management vs the BASIS study. Overall, these results demonstrate that a high proportion of bleeding events were treated with factor replacement therapy in the BASIS study, but that clinical management and treatment strategies may differ across trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHemophilia Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→