MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405044676 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-207450

Blinatumomab Added to Chemotherapy Improves Disease-Free Survival in Newly Diagnosed NCI Standard Risk Pediatric B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results from the Randomized Children's Oncology Group Study AALL1731

2024· article· en· W4405044676 sur OpenAlexaff
Rachel E. Rau, Sumit Gupta, John A. Kairalla, Karen R. Rabin, Anne Angiolillo, Cindy Wang, Andrew J. Carroll, Susan J. Conway, Meenakshi Devidas, Lia Gore, Ilan R. Kirsch, Holly R. Kubaney, Amanda M. Li, Jennifer L. McNeer, Olga Militano, Yvonne Moyer, Maureen M. O’Brien, Maki Okada, Shalini C. Reshmi, Mary Shago, Naomi Winick, Brent L. Wood, Faraz Zaman, Gerhard Zugmaier, Sue Zupanec, Stephen P. Hunger, David T. Teachey, Elizabeth A. Raetz, Mignon L. Loh

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Établissements canadiensBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineBlinatumomabOncologyInternal medicineChemotherapyLymphoblastic LeukemiaAcute lymphocytic leukemiaChemotherapy regimenPediatric oncologyLeukemiaPediatricsCancer

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood cancer. Children with newly-diagnosed, National Cancer Institute (NCI) standard risk (SR) B-ALL have high survival rates when treated with traditional chemotherapy (chemo), yet some relapse and die. Relapsed ALL is a leading cause of pediatric cancer mortality and about half of relapses occur in SR B-ALL. AALL1731 (NCT03914625) is a phase 3 randomized trial to determine if 2 non-sequential cycles of the bi-specific T-cell engager blinatumomab (15 mg/m2/day IV continuous x 28 days) added to chemo improves disease-free survival (DFS) in children with NCI SR B-ALL with average or higher relapse risk. Methods: AALL1731 enrolled newly diagnosed NCI SR (age >1 and <10 years with initial white blood cell count (WBC) <50,000/uL) B-ALL patients (pts), BCR::ABL1 negative, without testicular or CNS3 disease. After a 3-drug induction, pts were assigned to 3 risk groups based on tumor genetics, CNS status, and multiparameter flow cytometry (mpFC) defined minimal residual disease (MRD) at induction day 8 in peripheral blood (PB) and end of induction (EOI) in bone marrow (BM). Pts with favorable cytogenetics [ETV6::RUNX1 or double trisomies of chromosomes 4 and 10 (DT)], day 8 PB mpFC MRD <1% and EOI BM mpFC MRD <0.01% were categorized as SR-Favorable and non-randomly received chemo alone given known outstanding outcomes. Pts with unfavorable cytogenetics (iAMP21, KMT2A rearrangement, t(17;19), hypodiploidy), EOI mpFC MRD ≥0.1% for DT and ≥0.01% all others, or neutral cytogenetics with CNS2 status were categorized as SR-High. All others were considered SR-Average (Avg). SR-Avg pts were further stratified based on EOI BM high-throughput sequencing of immunoglobulin loci (HTS) MRD. Those with undetectable EOI HTS MRD were non-randomly assigned to standard-intensity chemo alone (Arm A); all others were randomized to Arm A or standard-intensity chemo plus 2 cycles of blinatumomab (Arm B). Post induction, SR-High pts received augmented BFM-based chemo. SR-High pts with end consolidation BM mpFC MRD <0.1% were randomized to chemo (Arm C) or chemo plus 2 cycles of blinatumomab (Arm D). Blinatumomab cycles were inserted before and after interim maintenance I. Planned accrual included 2245 pts with a minimum follow-up (FU) of 3 years. Results: Accrual began June 28, 2019. At the first planned interim efficacy analysis (data cutoff June 30, 2024), 1440 (63%) of the 2245 SR-Avg/SR-High eligible and evaluable pts had been randomized. Median age was 4.3 years [interquartile range (IQR) 2.8-6.4]; 52.6% were boys, 26% were Hispanic and 5% were non-Hispanic Black. Median FU was 2.5 years (IQR=1.6-3.2). 722 pts were randomized to control Arms A (418) and C (304), and 718 to blinatumomab Arms B (417) and D (301). In intent-to-treat analyses, the 3-year DFS (± standard error) was 96.0±1.2% for pts randomized to blinatumomab arms vs 87.9±2.1% for those randomized to control arms. Using a stratified log-rank test, adding blinatumomab significantly improved DFS [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-0.64, 1-sided p<0.0001], substantially exceeding pre-specified interim efficacy stopping criteria and prompting the COG data safety and monitoring committee to recommend early termination of randomization. Among SR-Avg patients, 3-year DFS for Arm B (blinatumomab) was 97.5±1.3% vs 90.2±2.3% for Arm A (control) (HR 0.33, 95%CI 0.15-0.69). For SR-High patients, 3-year DFS was 94.1±2.5% for Arm D (blinatumomab) vs 84.8±3.8% for Arm C (control) (HR 0.45, 95%CI 0.24-0.85). Overall, there were 6 deaths in remission, all among SR-High pts (Arm C=2, Arm D=4), none during blinatumomab cycles. Of 56 relapses on control arms, 10 were isolated CNS (iCNS), 34 isolated BM (iBM) and 5 combined CNS/BM. Of 19 relapses on blinatumomab arms, 9 were iCNS, 9 iBM, and 1 combined. Blinatumomab was well tolerated, with 0.3% of first courses associated with Grade 3+ cytokine release syndrome and 0.7% with seizures. Conclusions: This randomized clinical trial definitively establishes that adding blinatumomab to chemo significantly improves DFS in newly diagnosed childhood SR B-ALL, both of average and higher risk, resulting in outcomes similar to those previously achieved in only the most favorable risk subsets. The addition of blinatumomab represents a major breakthrough and is a new treatment standard, with implications for children with newly-diagnosed B-ALL.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,179
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,272
Écart entre enseignants0,264 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations9
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchTravaux en français237 207