MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405044676 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-207450

Blinatumomab Added to Chemotherapy Improves Disease-Free Survival in Newly Diagnosed NCI Standard Risk Pediatric B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results from the Randomized Children's Oncology Group Study AALL1731

2024· article· en· W4405044676 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel E. Rau, Sumit Gupta, John A. Kairalla, Karen R. Rabin, Anne Angiolillo, Cindy Wang, Andrew J. Carroll, Susan J. Conway, Meenakshi Devidas, Lia Gore, Ilan R. Kirsch, Holly R. Kubaney, Amanda M. Li, Jennifer L. McNeer, Olga Militano, Yvonne Moyer, Maureen M. O’Brien, Maki Okada, Shalini C. Reshmi, Mary Shago, Naomi Winick, Brent L. Wood, Faraz Zaman, Gerhard Zugmaier, Sue Zupanec, Stephen P. Hunger, David T. Teachey, Elizabeth A. Raetz, Mignon L. Loh

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBlinatumomabOncologyInternal medicineChemotherapyLymphoblastic LeukemiaAcute lymphocytic leukemiaChemotherapy regimenPediatric oncologyLeukemiaPediatricsCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood cancer. Children with newly-diagnosed, National Cancer Institute (NCI) standard risk (SR) B-ALL have high survival rates when treated with traditional chemotherapy (chemo), yet some relapse and die. Relapsed ALL is a leading cause of pediatric cancer mortality and about half of relapses occur in SR B-ALL. AALL1731 (NCT03914625) is a phase 3 randomized trial to determine if 2 non-sequential cycles of the bi-specific T-cell engager blinatumomab (15 mg/m2/day IV continuous x 28 days) added to chemo improves disease-free survival (DFS) in children with NCI SR B-ALL with average or higher relapse risk. Methods: AALL1731 enrolled newly diagnosed NCI SR (age >1 and <10 years with initial white blood cell count (WBC) <50,000/uL) B-ALL patients (pts), BCR::ABL1 negative, without testicular or CNS3 disease. After a 3-drug induction, pts were assigned to 3 risk groups based on tumor genetics, CNS status, and multiparameter flow cytometry (mpFC) defined minimal residual disease (MRD) at induction day 8 in peripheral blood (PB) and end of induction (EOI) in bone marrow (BM). Pts with favorable cytogenetics [ETV6::RUNX1 or double trisomies of chromosomes 4 and 10 (DT)], day 8 PB mpFC MRD <1% and EOI BM mpFC MRD <0.01% were categorized as SR-Favorable and non-randomly received chemo alone given known outstanding outcomes. Pts with unfavorable cytogenetics (iAMP21, KMT2A rearrangement, t(17;19), hypodiploidy), EOI mpFC MRD ≥0.1% for DT and ≥0.01% all others, or neutral cytogenetics with CNS2 status were categorized as SR-High. All others were considered SR-Average (Avg). SR-Avg pts were further stratified based on EOI BM high-throughput sequencing of immunoglobulin loci (HTS) MRD. Those with undetectable EOI HTS MRD were non-randomly assigned to standard-intensity chemo alone (Arm A); all others were randomized to Arm A or standard-intensity chemo plus 2 cycles of blinatumomab (Arm B). Post induction, SR-High pts received augmented BFM-based chemo. SR-High pts with end consolidation BM mpFC MRD <0.1% were randomized to chemo (Arm C) or chemo plus 2 cycles of blinatumomab (Arm D). Blinatumomab cycles were inserted before and after interim maintenance I. Planned accrual included 2245 pts with a minimum follow-up (FU) of 3 years. Results: Accrual began June 28, 2019. At the first planned interim efficacy analysis (data cutoff June 30, 2024), 1440 (63%) of the 2245 SR-Avg/SR-High eligible and evaluable pts had been randomized. Median age was 4.3 years [interquartile range (IQR) 2.8-6.4]; 52.6% were boys, 26% were Hispanic and 5% were non-Hispanic Black. Median FU was 2.5 years (IQR=1.6-3.2). 722 pts were randomized to control Arms A (418) and C (304), and 718 to blinatumomab Arms B (417) and D (301). In intent-to-treat analyses, the 3-year DFS (± standard error) was 96.0±1.2% for pts randomized to blinatumomab arms vs 87.9±2.1% for those randomized to control arms. Using a stratified log-rank test, adding blinatumomab significantly improved DFS [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-0.64, 1-sided p<0.0001], substantially exceeding pre-specified interim efficacy stopping criteria and prompting the COG data safety and monitoring committee to recommend early termination of randomization. Among SR-Avg patients, 3-year DFS for Arm B (blinatumomab) was 97.5±1.3% vs 90.2±2.3% for Arm A (control) (HR 0.33, 95%CI 0.15-0.69). For SR-High patients, 3-year DFS was 94.1±2.5% for Arm D (blinatumomab) vs 84.8±3.8% for Arm C (control) (HR 0.45, 95%CI 0.24-0.85). Overall, there were 6 deaths in remission, all among SR-High pts (Arm C=2, Arm D=4), none during blinatumomab cycles. Of 56 relapses on control arms, 10 were isolated CNS (iCNS), 34 isolated BM (iBM) and 5 combined CNS/BM. Of 19 relapses on blinatumomab arms, 9 were iCNS, 9 iBM, and 1 combined. Blinatumomab was well tolerated, with 0.3% of first courses associated with Grade 3+ cytokine release syndrome and 0.7% with seizures. Conclusions: This randomized clinical trial definitively establishes that adding blinatumomab to chemo significantly improves DFS in newly diagnosed childhood SR B-ALL, both of average and higher risk, resulting in outcomes similar to those previously achieved in only the most favorable risk subsets. The addition of blinatumomab represents a major breakthrough and is a new treatment standard, with implications for children with newly-diagnosed B-ALL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207