Iron and B12 Deficiency Has Rarely Been Considered in Studies Defining Hemoglobin Concentration Reference Intervals in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) defines anemia in pregnancy with a hemoglobin concentration threshold of 110 g/L in the first and third trimesters, and 105 g/L in the second trimester. Pregnancy is characterized by increased demand for iron and vitamin B12, which often leads to deficiencies during this time. It is unclear if WHO and other pregnancy anemia thresholds have considered the impact of iron and B12 deficiency. Objective: The objectives were to systematically summarize healthy pregnancy hemoglobin concentration reference intervals, means and medians, and to conduct a quality assessment investigating whether studies defining anemia thresholds in pregnancy excluded people at high risk of or with iron and B12 deficiency. Methods: We developed a comprehensive search strategy designed to explore Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Web of and the gray literature from inception to March 2024, and included randomized controlled trials, retrospective, and prospective observational studies. All included studies were screened by two independent reviewers and adjudicated by a third when there was disagreement. Studies that defined hemoglobin reference intervals and normal values in a healthy pregnant population were included. A quality assessment was performed based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline for establishing laboratory reference intervals, and clinical or laboratory evaluation of iron and B12 deficiency (such as bleeding history, dietary history, iron or B12 supplementation use, blood transfusion history, as well as measurement of mean corpuscular volume (MCV), serum ferritin or iron studies, and serum vitamin B12 levels). We used descriptive statistics, calculating proportions for categorical variables and medians for continuous variables, to summarize the data. Results: 5015 articles were initially identified, 366 were selected for full-text review, and 76 met inclusion criteria for detailed review, reporting a hemoglobin concentration reference interval, mean, or median. Among these, 45 studies aimed to define hemoglobin concentration reference intervals in healthy pregnant populations. 53% (24/45) of these studies did not adhere to CLSI guidelines for reference interval establishment. 56% (25/45) of studies did not exclude individuals with at least one clinical risk factor for iron deficiency, and 91% (41/45) did not exclude individuals with clinical risk factors for B12 deficiency. 91% (41/45) of the studies did not exclude pregnant people with laboratory evidence of iron deficiency. No studies excluded pregnant people with laboratory evidence of B12 deficiency. Of the 69 articles that aimed to define a normal mean or median hemoglobin concentration in a healthy pregnant population, 68% (47/69) did not exclude patients with at least one clinical risk factor for iron deficiency, and 96% (66/69) did not exclude those at risk for B12 deficiency. Additionally, 96% (66/69) of the studies did not exclude people with laboratory evidence of iron deficiency, and no study excluded people with laboratory evidence of B12 deficiency. The median lower limit of normal hemoglobin concentration reported in studies assessing reference intervals (n=45) was 109 g/L, 101 g/L, and 98 g/L for the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. When evaluating the studies that met CLSI standards, the median lower limit of normal of hemoglobin concentration was 106 g/L in the first trimester, and 98 g/L in both the second and third trimesters. One study that met CLSI standards excluded individuals with laboratory evidence of iron deficiency. Conclusion: We found that iron and B12 deficiencies have largely not been accounted for when defining reference intervals and normal hemoglobin concentrations in presumed healthy pregnant people. This structurally decreases the opportunity to correct for maternal anemia -which is associated with severe maternal morbidity, maternal mortality and negative fetal, neonatal and childhood outcomes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,022 | 0,115 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,011 | 0,007 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,018 | 0,022 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».