MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405047446 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-201096

Iron and B12 Deficiency Has Rarely Been Considered in Studies Defining Hemoglobin Concentration Reference Intervals in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review

2024· review· en· W4405047446 on OpenAlexaff
Vanessa Giuliano, Eva Bruketa, Teruko Kishibe, Ingrid Blydt-Hansen, Vidushi Swarup, Grace H. Tang, Michael Fralick, Michelle Sholzberg

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMean corpuscular volumePregnancyVitamin B12AnemiaIron deficiencyIron-deficiency anemiaPopulationHemoglobinObservational studyPediatricsObstetricsInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) defines anemia in pregnancy with a hemoglobin concentration threshold of 110 g/L in the first and third trimesters, and 105 g/L in the second trimester. Pregnancy is characterized by increased demand for iron and vitamin B12, which often leads to deficiencies during this time. It is unclear if WHO and other pregnancy anemia thresholds have considered the impact of iron and B12 deficiency. Objective: The objectives were to systematically summarize healthy pregnancy hemoglobin concentration reference intervals, means and medians, and to conduct a quality assessment investigating whether studies defining anemia thresholds in pregnancy excluded people at high risk of or with iron and B12 deficiency. Methods: We developed a comprehensive search strategy designed to explore Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Web of and the gray literature from inception to March 2024, and included randomized controlled trials, retrospective, and prospective observational studies. All included studies were screened by two independent reviewers and adjudicated by a third when there was disagreement. Studies that defined hemoglobin reference intervals and normal values in a healthy pregnant population were included. A quality assessment was performed based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline for establishing laboratory reference intervals, and clinical or laboratory evaluation of iron and B12 deficiency (such as bleeding history, dietary history, iron or B12 supplementation use, blood transfusion history, as well as measurement of mean corpuscular volume (MCV), serum ferritin or iron studies, and serum vitamin B12 levels). We used descriptive statistics, calculating proportions for categorical variables and medians for continuous variables, to summarize the data. Results: 5015 articles were initially identified, 366 were selected for full-text review, and 76 met inclusion criteria for detailed review, reporting a hemoglobin concentration reference interval, mean, or median. Among these, 45 studies aimed to define hemoglobin concentration reference intervals in healthy pregnant populations. 53% (24/45) of these studies did not adhere to CLSI guidelines for reference interval establishment. 56% (25/45) of studies did not exclude individuals with at least one clinical risk factor for iron deficiency, and 91% (41/45) did not exclude individuals with clinical risk factors for B12 deficiency. 91% (41/45) of the studies did not exclude pregnant people with laboratory evidence of iron deficiency. No studies excluded pregnant people with laboratory evidence of B12 deficiency. Of the 69 articles that aimed to define a normal mean or median hemoglobin concentration in a healthy pregnant population, 68% (47/69) did not exclude patients with at least one clinical risk factor for iron deficiency, and 96% (66/69) did not exclude those at risk for B12 deficiency. Additionally, 96% (66/69) of the studies did not exclude people with laboratory evidence of iron deficiency, and no study excluded people with laboratory evidence of B12 deficiency. The median lower limit of normal hemoglobin concentration reported in studies assessing reference intervals (n=45) was 109 g/L, 101 g/L, and 98 g/L for the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. When evaluating the studies that met CLSI standards, the median lower limit of normal of hemoglobin concentration was 106 g/L in the first trimester, and 98 g/L in both the second and third trimesters. One study that met CLSI standards excluded individuals with laboratory evidence of iron deficiency. Conclusion: We found that iron and B12 deficiencies have largely not been accounted for when defining reference intervals and normal hemoglobin concentrations in presumed healthy pregnant people. This structurally decreases the opportunity to correct for maternal anemia -which is associated with severe maternal morbidity, maternal mortality and negative fetal, neonatal and childhood outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.115
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.115
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.007
Bibliometrics0.0180.022
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.179
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicFolate and B Vitamins ResearchFrench-language works237,207