Results from the Hemophilia Α Cohort of the Non-Investigational Lead-in Study: Prospective Collection of Bleeding Rate in Participants with Hemophilia Α Prior to Phase 3 Study (AFFINE) of Giroctocogene Fitelparvovec
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Giroctocogene fitelparvovec (PF-07055480) is a liver-directed recombinant adeno-associated virus serotype 6 (AAV6) gene therapy vector encoding a B-domain-deleted variant of human factor VIII (FVIII) that enables sustained endogenous FVIII expression. AFFINE (NCT04370054) is an ongoing, pivotal phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of giroctocogene fitelparvovec in individuals with hemophilia A. The primary endpoint of the AFFINE trial is to demonstrate non-inferiority in total (treated and untreated) annualized bleeding rate (ABR) compared with routine prophylactic FVIII replacement therapy collected prospectively in a separate lead-in trial. We present the results of the lead-in trial initiated to establish prospective bleeding and infusion rates while on FVIII prophylaxis replacement therapy in the usual care setting of participants with hemophilia A. The baseline data obtained in this trial will be used for comparison with data collected post gene therapy for those participants who subsequently enrolled in the giroctocogene fitelparvovec phase 3 AFFINE trial. Methods: This study (NCT03587116) is a prospective, noninterventional, phase 3 lead-in trial that enrolled adult men ≥18 to <65 years old with moderately severe to severe hemophilia A (FVIII ≤1%) on stable prophylaxis FVIII replacement therapy who tested negative for neutralizing antibodies (nAb) to AAV6. The trial is multi-regional in 18 countries in North America, South America, Asia Pacific, Europe, and the Middle East. Participants were instructed to record infusions and bleeding events in an electronic diary, with most participants providing ≥6 months of data prior to entry in the phase 3 AFFINE trial. Selected safety data (serious adverse events [SAEs] and medically important events of FVIII inhibitor, thrombotic events, and factor hypersensitivity reactions) of FVIII replacement therapy were also collected. Results: In all, 241 patients with hemophilia A were screened and 101 were enrolled in the hemophilia A cohort of this lead-in trial (data for the hemophilia B cohort have been presented previously). The most common reason for screen failure was nAb positivity at screening in 115 (82.1%) of the 140 screen failures. The mean (range) age of those enrolled was 31.8 (18 to 64) years. Most participants were 18-44 years of age (84 [83.2%]), White (78 [77.2%]), and not Hispanic or Latino (76 [75.2%]). Target joints were identified in 47 (46.5%) participants. Overall, 84 (83.2%) participants had ≥180 days of follow-up; the mean (SD) follow-up duration of these participants was 351.3 (197.32) days and 23 (22.8%) had ≥1 year of follow-up. Overall, 17 (16.8%) participants had <180 days of follow-up; the mean (SD) follow-up duration of these participants was 84.8 (43.64) days. The overall mean (SD) follow-up duration was 306.5 (206.55) days. The mean (SD) total ABR was 6.1 (10.6), mean (SD) treated ABR was 4.87 (7.2), and mean (SD) annualized infusion rate (AIR) was 127.1 (51.8). The mean (SD) annualized total FVIII replacement therapy consumption was 304,998 (153,932) IU. Of the 101 participants, 4 (4.0%) experienced 4 SAEs (hemorrhoidal hemorrhage, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, wound infection, and B-cell lymphoma; n=1 [1.0%] each); all SAEs were severe except upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, which was moderate in severity. No adverse events of special interest were reported, and no safety signals were identified for FVIII replacement therapy. Conclusions: The ABR and AIR collected in this lead-in trial are representative of FVIII prophylaxis in hemophilia A populations. Although FVIII prophylaxis was well tolerated, with no emerging safety signals, a total ABR of 6.1 illustrates the limitations of current standard of care prophylaxis. The total ABR reported in a subset of participants who went on to enroll in the phase 3 AFFINE trial of giroctocogene fitelparvovec will be used as the comparator for the primary endpoint evaluating noninferiority post gene therapy, in accordance with the AFFINE trial protocol.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».