MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405048671 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-193298

Feasibility of Discontinuation of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Patient Survey

2024· article· en· W4405048671 sur OpenAlexaff
Deborah M. Stephens, Chris Stewart, Liza Avruch, Catherine C. Coombs, Alexey V. Danilov, Brian T. Hill, Mazyar Shadman, Alina S. Gerrie, Christopher E. Jensen, Marc Hoffmann, Allison Winter, Daniel A. Ermann, Paul M. Barr, Susan O’Brien, Brian Koffman, John C. Byrd

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDiscontinuationChronic lymphocytic leukemiaMedicinePopulationInternal medicineLeukemia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction While Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have significantly prolonged survival for patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), continuous administration can increase the burden of physical, emotional, and financial toxicity. Little is known about the feasibility of time-limited administration of BTKi for CLL pts or clinical outcomes of discontinuation (DC) of BTKi for reasons other than CLL progression. We aimed to analyze and report the outcomes of this group via a pt survey. Methods Utilizing the email distribution list from the CLL Society (pt advocacy group), we solicited volunteers with CLL who self-reported DC of a BTKi for reasons other than CLL progression to fill out a de-identified web-based survey. Pts reported the length of time on BTKi, the clinical circumstances surrounding BTKi DC, and the clinical outcomes following BTKi DC. Perceived quality of life (QOL) was assessed on a 5-point scale with 1=Poor QOL and 5=Very Good QOL. Differences in perceived QOL were evaluated using Wilcoxon signed Rank Tests. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results Of the 170 pts included in the analysis, 57% received their first BTKi in the frontline setting. First BTKi received included ibrutinib (79%), acalabrutinib (17%), and zanubrutinib (4%). BTKi was DC in <6 months (mos), 6-12 mos, 1-2 years (yrs), 2-4 yrs, and >4 yrs in 19%, 18%, 21%, 28%, and 14% of pts, respectively. While the most common reason for DC BTKi was toxicity (62%), 14% and 8% reported DC because their CLL was in remission or a personal choice, respectively. The most common adverse events (AE) that led to BTKi DC were atrial fibrillation (20%) arthralgias (17%), and bleeding/bruising (11%). Of those who DC due to AE, 67% reported that the AE resolved quickly, and an additional 24% reported that the AE at least partially improved after DC. When asked how they would feel about stopping the BTKi, the majority of pts were relieved that they may eliminate AE (45%), could focus less on their CLL (11%), and would no longer have to pay for the medicine (7%), while 29% experienced anxiety. A statistically significant increase in perceived QOL was observed from prior versus post BTKi DC. Prior to BTKi DC, 31% indicated a poor/somewhat poor QOL, with only 5% reporting the same after DC. Those who reported moderately/very good QOL increased from 52% pre-DC to 78% post-DC. Following BTKi DC, 45% (76/170) reported that their CLL had not come back. Of these, 42%, 32%, and 27%, have been off BTKi treatment for <1 yr, 1-2 yrs, and >2 yrs, respectively. Of pts who reported that they experienced evidence of CLL progression by detection of increasing white blood cell counts or size of lymph nodes (n=80), 46% reported that these events did not happen for ≥1 yr after BTKi DC. Those that were on a BTKi for ≥2 yrs before DC had more time without CLL relapse. Of pts that received BTKi for ≥2 yrs and reported CLL relapse (n=25), 44% were off therapy for ≥2 yrs before disease relapse and only 8% relapsed within 3 mos. Of pts that received BTKi for <2 yrs and reported CLL relapse (n=55), 11% were off therapy for ≥2 yrs before disease relapse and 31% relapsed within 3 mos. While 36% reported starting a new treatment for CLL within 6 mos of BTKi DC, a larger number of pts (50%) did not begin another CLL treatment for ≥1 yr after DC. Those that were on a BTKi for ≥2 yrs before DC had more time before starting a new CLL treatment. Of pts that received BTKi for ≥2 yrs and then received subsequent CLL treatment (n=20), 60% were off therapy for ≥2 yrs without receiving subsequent CLL treatment, while only 15% received subsequent CLL treatment within 3 mos. Of pts that received BTKi for <2 yrs and then received subsequent CLL treatment (n=58), 14% were off therapy for ≥2 yrs without receiving subsequent CLL treatment, while 22% received subsequent CLL treatment within 3 mos. Conclusion In a survey of CLL pts who DC BTKi for reasons other than CLL progression, their perceived QOL significantly improved after BTKi DC and 45% reported no CLL progression with the majority >1 yr out from DC. Those that were on a BTKi for ≥2 yrs before DC appear to have longer periods of time without the CLL returning and/or needing to start a new CLL treatment. While limited by the constraints of a survey, these data suggest that a prospective study of utilization of time-limited BTKi therapy for CLL is warranted to better understand the clinical feasibility and impact of this treatment course.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,112
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,983

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,270
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207