MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405048671 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-193298

Feasibility of Discontinuation of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Patient Survey

2024· article· en· W4405048671 on OpenAlexaff
Deborah M. Stephens, Chris Stewart, Liza Avruch, Catherine C. Coombs, Alexey V. Danilov, Brian T. Hill, Mazyar Shadman, Alina S. Gerrie, Christopher E. Jensen, Marc Hoffmann, Allison Winter, Daniel A. Ermann, Paul M. Barr, Susan O’Brien, Brian Koffman, John C. Byrd

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscontinuationChronic lymphocytic leukemiaMedicinePopulationInternal medicineLeukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction While Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have significantly prolonged survival for patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), continuous administration can increase the burden of physical, emotional, and financial toxicity. Little is known about the feasibility of time-limited administration of BTKi for CLL pts or clinical outcomes of discontinuation (DC) of BTKi for reasons other than CLL progression. We aimed to analyze and report the outcomes of this group via a pt survey. Methods Utilizing the email distribution list from the CLL Society (pt advocacy group), we solicited volunteers with CLL who self-reported DC of a BTKi for reasons other than CLL progression to fill out a de-identified web-based survey. Pts reported the length of time on BTKi, the clinical circumstances surrounding BTKi DC, and the clinical outcomes following BTKi DC. Perceived quality of life (QOL) was assessed on a 5-point scale with 1=Poor QOL and 5=Very Good QOL. Differences in perceived QOL were evaluated using Wilcoxon signed Rank Tests. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results Of the 170 pts included in the analysis, 57% received their first BTKi in the frontline setting. First BTKi received included ibrutinib (79%), acalabrutinib (17%), and zanubrutinib (4%). BTKi was DC in <6 months (mos), 6-12 mos, 1-2 years (yrs), 2-4 yrs, and >4 yrs in 19%, 18%, 21%, 28%, and 14% of pts, respectively. While the most common reason for DC BTKi was toxicity (62%), 14% and 8% reported DC because their CLL was in remission or a personal choice, respectively. The most common adverse events (AE) that led to BTKi DC were atrial fibrillation (20%) arthralgias (17%), and bleeding/bruising (11%). Of those who DC due to AE, 67% reported that the AE resolved quickly, and an additional 24% reported that the AE at least partially improved after DC. When asked how they would feel about stopping the BTKi, the majority of pts were relieved that they may eliminate AE (45%), could focus less on their CLL (11%), and would no longer have to pay for the medicine (7%), while 29% experienced anxiety. A statistically significant increase in perceived QOL was observed from prior versus post BTKi DC. Prior to BTKi DC, 31% indicated a poor/somewhat poor QOL, with only 5% reporting the same after DC. Those who reported moderately/very good QOL increased from 52% pre-DC to 78% post-DC. Following BTKi DC, 45% (76/170) reported that their CLL had not come back. Of these, 42%, 32%, and 27%, have been off BTKi treatment for <1 yr, 1-2 yrs, and >2 yrs, respectively. Of pts who reported that they experienced evidence of CLL progression by detection of increasing white blood cell counts or size of lymph nodes (n=80), 46% reported that these events did not happen for ≥1 yr after BTKi DC. Those that were on a BTKi for ≥2 yrs before DC had more time without CLL relapse. Of pts that received BTKi for ≥2 yrs and reported CLL relapse (n=25), 44% were off therapy for ≥2 yrs before disease relapse and only 8% relapsed within 3 mos. Of pts that received BTKi for <2 yrs and reported CLL relapse (n=55), 11% were off therapy for ≥2 yrs before disease relapse and 31% relapsed within 3 mos. While 36% reported starting a new treatment for CLL within 6 mos of BTKi DC, a larger number of pts (50%) did not begin another CLL treatment for ≥1 yr after DC. Those that were on a BTKi for ≥2 yrs before DC had more time before starting a new CLL treatment. Of pts that received BTKi for ≥2 yrs and then received subsequent CLL treatment (n=20), 60% were off therapy for ≥2 yrs without receiving subsequent CLL treatment, while only 15% received subsequent CLL treatment within 3 mos. Of pts that received BTKi for <2 yrs and then received subsequent CLL treatment (n=58), 14% were off therapy for ≥2 yrs without receiving subsequent CLL treatment, while 22% received subsequent CLL treatment within 3 mos. Conclusion In a survey of CLL pts who DC BTKi for reasons other than CLL progression, their perceived QOL significantly improved after BTKi DC and 45% reported no CLL progression with the majority >1 yr out from DC. Those that were on a BTKi for ≥2 yrs before DC appear to have longer periods of time without the CLL returning and/or needing to start a new CLL treatment. While limited by the constraints of a survey, these data suggest that a prospective study of utilization of time-limited BTKi therapy for CLL is warranted to better understand the clinical feasibility and impact of this treatment course.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207