Clinical Outcomes over 2 Years of Once-Weekly Efanesoctocog Alfa Treatment in Children with Severe Hemophilia A: Second Interim Analysis from the Phase 3 XTEND-ed Long-Term Extension Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Efanesoctocog alfa (formerly BIVV001) is a first-in-class high-sustained factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy designed to overcome the von Willebrand factor-imposed half-life ceiling. Once-weekly efanesoctocog alfa 50 IU/kg was well tolerated and provided highly effective bleed protection in children with severe hemophilia A in the XTEND-Kids study (NCT04759131). Efanesoctocog alfa maintained high sustained FVIII activity throughout the weekly dosing interval in the normal to near-normal range of >40 IU/dL for ~3 days and >10 IU/dL for ~7 days at steady state. Here, we present data from the second interim analysis on the long-term safety and efficacy of efanesoctocog alfa in previously treated children with severe hemophilia A in the XTEND-ed study (NCT04644575). Methods XTEND-ed is a multicenter, open-label study that enrolled participants from previous Phase 3 studies, including children <12 years of age who completed the XTEND-Kids study. Participants continued weekly 50 IU/kg prophylaxis with efanesoctocog alfa in XTEND-ed (Arm A). The primary endpoint is the occurrence of FVIII inhibitors (determined by the Nijmegen modified Bethesda assay). Secondary endpoints include annualized bleed rates (ABRs) for treated bleeds, efficacy for bleed treatment, and safety. Participants provided informed consent and XTEND-ed was approved by applicable ethics committees. Data cut: February 22, 2024. Results Of 74 males, 71 (age: <6 years, n=35; 6-<12 years, n=36) rolled over from XTEND-Kids to XTEND-ed. The median (range) treatment duration in XTEND-ed was 66.6 (36.3-100.6) weeks. The median (range) cumulative treatment duration from XTEND-Kids baseline was 119.1 (88.1-152.6) weeks. No FVIII inhibitors were detected. During XTEND-ed, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) ABR evaluated for Day 1-Month 6 (n=71) was 0.59 (1.38), Months 6-12 (n=71) was 0.77 (1.64), and Months 12-18 (n=53) was 0.71 (2.49), with 57 of 71 (80.3%), 54 of 71 (76.1%), and 44 of 53 (83.0%) participants with zero bleeds, respectively. The mean (95% confidence interval) model-based ABR for the whole efficacy period was 0.67 (0.48; 0.93). The mean (SD) spontaneous bleeds per participant was 0.1 (0.3) and traumatic bleeds per participant was 0.6 (0.9). Of 61 bleeds, 54 (88.5%) resolved with a single dose of efanesoctocog alfa 50 IU/kg, with the hemostatic response rated as excellent or good for 43/45 (95.6%) bleeds. The median (range) total weekly efanesoctocog alfa consumption due to prophylaxis and bleed treatment was 54.0 (47.1-74.1) IU/kg. Overall, 55 (77.5%) participants experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) with 4 (5.6%) experiencing ≥1 serious TEAE. The commonly reported TEAEs were cough (14.1%), arthralgia (12.7%), and pyrexia (11.3%). Two treatment-related TEAEs were reported in one participant; left arm pain after injection and headache after injection. Serious TEAEs were partial seizures, muscle hematoma, head injury, and thermal burn reported for 1 (1.4%) participant, each; none were considered treatment related. None of the TEAEs led to death or treatment discontinuation. There were no thrombotic events. Conclusion The results from over 2 years in previously treated children with severe hemophilia A show that once-weekly efanesoctocog alfa continues to be well tolerated and provides highly effective bleed protection with no FVIII inhibitors reported.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».