INDIA'S NONVIOLENT FREEDOM STRUGGLE: THE THOMAS CHRISTIANS (1599–1799). By Clara A. B.Joseph. New York: Routledge, 2024. Pp. xvi + 164; Hardback, GBP £ 135.00.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
India's Nonviolent Freedom Struggle is a seminal work by Clara A. B. Joseph that reinterprets the Indian freedom movement, focusing on the Thomas Christians, a South Indian Christian community that engaged in nonviolent resistance against European colonization from 1599 to 1799. This book has five chapters, and it pursues three main objectives: providing an in-depth analysis of primary sources rarely studied by scholars, challenging existing discourses in canonical and postcolonial studies about the Indian nation, and reconceptualizing the postcolonial nation by exploring the nonviolent resistance of the Thomas Christians. Highlighting their significant yet often overlooked contributions to India's nonviolent struggle for independence, Joseph, a Professor of English and Religious Studies at the University of Calgary, reveals the complex dynamics between colonizers and the colonized, encouraging a reimagining of their relationship. This essential text for scholars of colonialism, anti-colonial movements, and Indian history offers a unique perspective on a lesser-known aspect of India's freedom struggle. The author uses a letter from Francis Xavier in 1545 to illustrate the foundational characteristics of colonialism: power, theft, injustice, and exploitative discourse. She demonstrates how the Thomas Christians, tracing their lineage to St. Thomas, combined martial and nonviolent resistance, notably through the Coonen Cross Oath of 1653, which showcased their preference for non-cooperation over subjugation. Joseph compares their methods with Mahatma Gandhi's Satyagraha, showing that nonviolent resistance was part of Indian culture long before Gandhi's time. Much of the book focuses on the Thomas Christians' struggle against the Portuguese, who used religious reforms as tools of colonial control. The Synod of Diamper (1599), led by Archbishop Alexis de Meneses, is examined as a colonial tool enforcing Latinization and suppressing local Christian traditions. The book also critiques postcolonial scholarship for often neglecting the anti-colonial efforts of Indian Christians in the sixteenth century. The author illustrates how ecclesiastical policies intertwined with colonial ambitions, revealing that the Thomas Christians maintained their traditions and resisted colonial influences through non-cooperation and strategic use of their liturgical texts. Figures like Archdeacon George of Christ exemplified this resistance by refusing ordination under the Latin rite. The author argues that the Thomas Christians' theological stance was both canonical and anti-colonial, and their resistance strategies necessitated a broader understanding of colonial resistance in India. The narrative also delves into the Synod of Diamper's impact on the Thomas Christians, describing the Machiavellian tactics used by the Portuguese to enforce compliance, such as prohibiting clergy from trade and enforcing clerical celibacy to ensure dependence on the Portuguese. These measures were colonial strategies rather than purely religious reforms. The resistance of the Thomas Christians, including migration and direct opposition, is portrayed as part of a broader anti-colonial struggle. The book also explores the Coonen Cross Oath of 1653 as a pivotal act of resistance against Jesuit control and Portuguese economic exploitation, emphasizing the intertwining of religious and anti-colonial sentiments. Joseph discusses the schism within the Thomas Christians and the broader socio-political dynamics, highlighting their strategic non-cooperation and ecclesiastical self-determination. The narrative shifts to European colonial competition and internal divisions among the Thomas Christians in the eighteenth century. Joseph uses the Varthamanappusthakam, India's first modern travelogue, to shed light on the community's struggles and resistance against Portuguese interference. The book critiques the European missionaries' exploitation of the Thomas Christians and their economic resources, arguing that this exploitation was part of the broader colonial project. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 2022 statement about India's long struggle for freedom serves as a modern reflection on the enduring resistance against colonial powers. Joseph's work underscores the importance of recognizing the Thomas Christians' contributions to India's freedom struggle, challenging the misconception that Indian Christians were passive supporters of European colonization. To summarize, India's Nonviolent Freedom Struggle emphasizes the need to revisit and includes minority narratives in the broader history of India's independence movement. This brings to light the intricate relationships that exist between religion, colonialism, and resistance. This book provides the reader with a historical treat about the history of the Indian Church, particularly the Thomas Christians, as well as the legacy of the Indian nonviolent freedom struggle. The book challenges the misconception that traditional Christians did not lead the freedom struggle against European colonization in India. It argues that Thomas Christians were actively involved in anti-colonial efforts, enduring and resisting oppressive measures of their times. Historical narratives often misrepresent their struggle as solely ecclesiastical or spiritual, overlooking their broader socio-political impact. The text highlights the importance of re-examining colonial documents and policies, such as mandatory clerical celibacy, as products of colonization that need decolonization. It emphasizes the need for ecumenical dialogue to include decolonial perspectives, replacing colonial interpretations of resistance with decolonial critiques. By studying the nonviolent resistance of Thomas Christians, the book seeks to redefine India's freedom struggle, highlighting the unity of religion and state during colonialism and the persistent socio-economic inequalities in postcolonial societies. This scholarly and scientific work deserves special appreciation, and I strongly recommend this book to all who have a passion for history, particularly those who are scholars of Indian history, world religions, and postcolonial studies. May people benefit from Joseph's edifying work.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».