P96 Effectiveness and safety of bimekizumab for adult patients with plaque psoriasis: an interim analysis of 2-year data from a real-world, multicentre, retrospective study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract While open-label extension studies have investigated the long-term utility of bimekizumab, a novel interleukin-17A/IL-17F inhibitor for plaque psoriasis, real-world evidence (RWE) is limited. This RWE study reports on 2-year bimekizumab use. Our retrospective multicentre study included adult patients with plaque psoriasis from four Canadian institutions initiated on bimekizumab. Effectiveness outcomes included Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), psoriasis area and severity index (PASI), body surface area (BSA), and IGA × BSA scores. Safety was assessed via treatment-related adverse events (AEs). A nonresponder imputation (NRI) analysis was used to account for missing data regarding treatment-related discontinuations prior to 104 ± 8 weeks. This analysis included 37 patients. Mean age was 44.4 (range: 19–74) years, with 59.5% (22/37) being male. At Weeks 104 ± 8 (n = 37): IGA 0/1 was achieved by 72.7% (24/33); mean PASI, BSA, and IGA × BSA improvements from baseline were 73% (11.3–2.7), 72.6% (14–3.5%), and 71.8% (31.4–3.4), respectively; 73% (27/37), 64.9% (24/37), and 59.5% (22/37) achieved PASI75, 90% improvement in PASI (PASI90), and 100% improvement in PASI (PASI100), respectively; 73% (27/37), 73% (27/37), and 67.6% (25/37) achieved absolute PASI scores <3, <2, and <1; and 59.5% (22/37) achieved BSA <1%. Furthermore, for patients not achieving IGA 0/1, PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100 at Week 52 ± 6, these responses were subsequently achieved in 100% (3/3), 60% (3/5), 33.3% (2/6), and 28.6% (2/7) of patients at Week 104 ± 8, respectively. Loss of initial Week 52 ± 6 IGA 0/1, PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100 responses occurred in 12.5% (2/16), 4% (1/25), 4.2% (1/24), and 4.5% (1/22) of patients by Week 104 ± 8, respectively. During the maintenance period, dose escalation from every 8 weeks to every 4 weeks was required in 29.7% (11/37) of patients. Twelve treatment-related AEs occurred (32.4%, 12/37), including candidiasis [10.8%, 4/37; oral (n = 3); intertriginous (n = 1)], and bacterial folliculitis (8.1%, 3/37). Nine treatment discontinuations (24.3%) were documented [lack of efficacy (n = 4); AEs: anxiety (n = 1), inflammatory bowel disease (n = 1); nasopharyngitis (n = 1), recurrent respiratory infection (n = 1); pregnancy (n = 1)]. No serious infections, suicidal ideation/behaviour, malignancies, hypersensitivity reactions, major adverse cardiac events, or hepatic abnormalities were observed over 73.6 patient-years of safety follow-up. To date, three open-label extension studies (BE RADIANT; BE BRIGHT; BE SURE) have evaluated 2-year outcomes of bimekizumab. In these studies, NRI outcomes for IGA 0/1, PASI90, and PASI100 ranged from 74.7–85.9%, 76.6–87%, and 64.6–68.9%, respectively. Our real-world effectiveness outcomes are comparable to these results with no new safety signals. Overall, we highlight the sustained long-term effectiveness and safety of bimekizumab up to 2 years. Study limitations include small sample size and retrospective nature.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».