MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405229307 · doi:10.1093/bjd/ljae360.126

P96 Effectiveness and safety of bimekizumab for adult patients with plaque psoriasis: an interim analysis of 2-year data from a real-world, multicentre, retrospective study

2024· article· en· W4405229307 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Dermatology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterim analysisPlaque psoriasisInterimPsoriasisRetrospective cohort studyDermatologyInternal medicineClinical trialHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract While open-label extension studies have investigated the long-term utility of bimekizumab, a novel interleukin-17A/IL-17F inhibitor for plaque psoriasis, real-world evidence (RWE) is limited. This RWE study reports on 2-year bimekizumab use. Our retrospective multicentre study included adult patients with plaque psoriasis from four Canadian institutions initiated on bimekizumab. Effectiveness outcomes included Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), psoriasis area and severity index (PASI), body surface area (BSA), and IGA × BSA scores. Safety was assessed via treatment-related adverse events (AEs). A nonresponder imputation (NRI) analysis was used to account for missing data regarding treatment-related discontinuations prior to 104 ± 8 weeks. This analysis included 37 patients. Mean age was 44.4 (range: 19–74) years, with 59.5% (22/37) being male. At Weeks 104 ± 8 (n = 37): IGA 0/1 was achieved by 72.7% (24/33); mean PASI, BSA, and IGA × BSA improvements from baseline were 73% (11.3–2.7), 72.6% (14–3.5%), and 71.8% (31.4–3.4), respectively; 73% (27/37), 64.9% (24/37), and 59.5% (22/37) achieved PASI75, 90% improvement in PASI (PASI90), and 100% improvement in PASI (PASI100), respectively; 73% (27/37), 73% (27/37), and 67.6% (25/37) achieved absolute PASI scores <3, <2, and <1; and 59.5% (22/37) achieved BSA <1%. Furthermore, for patients not achieving IGA 0/1, PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100 at Week 52 ± 6, these responses were subsequently achieved in 100% (3/3), 60% (3/5), 33.3% (2/6), and 28.6% (2/7) of patients at Week 104 ± 8, respectively. Loss of initial Week 52 ± 6 IGA 0/1, PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100 responses occurred in 12.5% (2/16), 4% (1/25), 4.2% (1/24), and 4.5% (1/22) of patients by Week 104 ± 8, respectively. During the maintenance period, dose escalation from every 8 weeks to every 4 weeks was required in 29.7% (11/37) of patients. Twelve treatment-related AEs occurred (32.4%, 12/37), including candidiasis [10.8%, 4/37; oral (n = 3); intertriginous (n = 1)], and bacterial folliculitis (8.1%, 3/37). Nine treatment discontinuations (24.3%) were documented [lack of efficacy (n = 4); AEs: anxiety (n = 1), inflammatory bowel disease (n = 1); nasopharyngitis (n = 1), recurrent respiratory infection (n = 1); pregnancy (n = 1)]. No serious infections, suicidal ideation/behaviour, malignancies, hypersensitivity reactions, major adverse cardiac events, or hepatic abnormalities were observed over 73.6 patient-years of safety follow-up. To date, three open-label extension studies (BE RADIANT; BE BRIGHT; BE SURE) have evaluated 2-year outcomes of bimekizumab. In these studies, NRI outcomes for IGA 0/1, PASI90, and PASI100 ranged from 74.7–85.9%, 76.6–87%, and 64.6–68.9%, respectively. Our real-world effectiveness outcomes are comparable to these results with no new safety signals. Overall, we highlight the sustained long-term effectiveness and safety of bimekizumab up to 2 years. Study limitations include small sample size and retrospective nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of DermatologySame topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207