CREATION AND ACTIVITIES OF LOCAL TOPONYMIC COMMISSIONS FOR THE DECOMMUNISATION OF PUBLIC SPACE IN UKRAINE (LATE 20TH – THE FIRST QUARTER OF THE 21ST CENTURY)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The aim of the paper is to analyze the processes of creation and activity of local commissions for the decommunisation of public space in Ukraine from the late 20th century to the first quarter of the 21st century. The methodology of the research is based on the core principles of historical knowledge, incorporating general scientific and special historical methods, an interdisciplinary approach, sociological, cultural, and toponymic tools. The scientific novelty is conditioned by the fact that this is the first comprehensive study to present the creation and activity of local toponymic commissions for the decommunisation of public space in Ukraine from the late 20th century to the first quarter of the 21st century. As a result, the author comes to the conclusion that local toponymic commissions were important for the decommunisation of public space in Ukraine at the end of the 20th – in the first quarter of the 21st century. The commissions were consultative and advisory structures at local self-government bodies, preparing proposals for the decommunisation of public space (changing the names of toponyms that were associated with Soviet and Russian imperial realities). Local toponymic commissions were created in several stages: from the beginning of the declaration of state independence of Ukraine; after the adoption of decommunisation laws; during the full-scale Russian-Ukrainian war. For the most part, especially in the early 1990s, the decommunisation of public space was carried out by local self-government bodies, because the mandatory creation of toponymic commissions was not provided for by legislation. Sometimes the proposals of toponymic commissions for the decommunisation of public space were not supported by a part of the residents of settlements and local self-government bodies. In the 1990s, this was due to the fact that some «Soviet» toponyms were named after Ukrainian national figures, the attitude towards which was ambiguous in society. Recently, there have been discussions about the renaming of toponyms, which were associated with the memory of the Second World War and the imperial heritage. Such problematic issues were resolved through additional discussion.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».