Singing Frogs, Looping the Slam
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Those who had passed through the doors of Midtown – and, almost invariably – other institutions repeatedly, were sometimes more dismissive of my line of enquiry. The phrase ‘singing frogs’ came from a conversation with David, a governor visiting from Bermuda. He was somewhat resistant to the idea prisons were noisy, but tacitly understood the role acclimation played in this. He was too deeply embedded within the rhythms of the institution to consciously discern them. Sound was heavily implicated in processes of institutionalization. Prompting people to reflect on their shifting interpretations of the soundscape provided a means of assessing both their degree of familiarity with the environment and feelings about the place and people within it. For some, familiarity with the prison soundscape reflected sustained contact with a broader range of institutions with which its clangs and bangs reverberated. For others, the soundscape was a particularly harsh aspect of the environment, compounding and exacerbating other conditions, including ASD and PTSD. While waiting for staff to assemble for a security meeting, I sat with David. He enquired about what I was doing and expressed incredulity that I held keys and seemed to move around with freedom. When I explained my purpose, he responded: ‘I’ve never thought of prisons as noisy places. I still don't but it reminds me of friends we have who visit from Canada. They can't sleep at night for the singing frogs, they go all through the night and make a racket. We’re so accustomed to it we don't hear it. ’The exchange between David and I raised a central point: does sound matter if it is not perceived as significant by those you speak with? And if so, why and how? When I asked how he relaxed, he said: “I like to unwind, no talking. Sometimes I like to just drive around. If I go straight back home, I’m a different person.” His dismissal of the significance of prison noise was contradicted by his use of sound (and space) as part of his shedding ritual. Manipulating his sonic environment was crucial for David, in guarding against ‘spillover’ of his work life into his private life. Curating his soundscape allowed him to leave the prison behind, to ‘shed’ it (Crawley, 2004).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,011 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,022 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».