RICHTER TRANSFORMATION OF CLL DISEASE: A CASE REPORT WITH CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM INVOLVEMENT
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Richter transformation (Richter syndrome) is defined as the transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) into an aggressive lymphoma. Richter transformation is estimated to occur with a rate of 5-10% (1). In this article, we aimed to present a case of Richter transformation with central nervous system (CNS) involvement. In 2018, a 64-year-old woman who presented with lymphocytosis underwent flow cytometry examination and was diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). 6 cycles of Rituximab + Bendomustine treatment was administered. In 2024, the patient was admitted to the neurosurgery outpatient clinic with complaints of balance disorder, slowing of speech and facial slippage, and lesions were detected in the periventricular area at the level of basal ganglia in the brain (Figure 1). CSF examination did not reveal any findings in favour of lymphoma. A biopsy was taken from the intracranial mass. The biopsy result was reported as high-grade B- cell lymphoma. Transition from CHL to lymphoma was evaluated as Richter transformation. On PET CT examination, a 13*11 mm hyperdense lesion at the level of the left basal nucleus nucleus lentiformis, showing intense hyper metabolic activity compared to the surrounding parenchyma, showed central nervous system involvement of lymphoma. The patient was interned to the BMT ward and MATRIX protocol containing high-dose Ara-C and high-dose methotrexate with high CNS transmission was applied for a total of 3 cycles. Control brain imaging showed regression of the mass lesion observed in the previous examination. Central nervous system (CNS) infiltration is rare in Richter syndrome (RS). It has only been discussed at the case level (2). Various symptoms including headache, convulsions, diplopia, ataxia, facial paralysis and cognitive dysfunction are observed in these patients (3). In our patient, neurological findings including balance disorder, slowing of speech and facial slipping were observed. Central nervous system involvement was diagnosed by brain biopsy. When the literature is analysed, CNS involvement in these patients is very rare and usually demonstrated by CSF analysis. In a few patients, the diagnosis was made by brain biopsy as in our patient (3). In the literature, no optimal treatment has been reported in patients with Richter transformation with CNS involvement. Negative results have been shown despite treatments including high dose Methotrexate and Rituximab (1,2,3). In our case, successful results were obtained with MATRIX -C protocol including high dose Ara-C and high dose methotrexate. As a result of this treatment, regression was observed in control brain imaging. CONCLUSION: Richter transformation with CNS involvement is a rare but life-threatening condition. Close follow-up in the course of CLL, early diagnosis and initiation of appropriate chemotherapy may be life-saving. References: 1. PRONELLO, Edoardo, et al. Richter's syndrome of the central nervous system. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 2021, 48.6: 889-892. 2. Xu L, Song J Ch, Xiu H S, and et al. Richter's syndrome of the central nervous system diagnosed concurrently with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: A case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(41): e12701. 3. Nakanishi T, Ito T, Fujita Sh, etal. Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia with Central Nervous System Involvement: A Case Report with Literature Review. J Blood Med. 2020; 11: 487–502.Figure 1: Intracranial mass appearance on computed tomography of the brain (marked with red colour)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».