RICHTER TRANSFORMATION OF CLL DISEASE: A CASE REPORT WITH CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM INVOLVEMENT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Richter transformation (Richter syndrome) is defined as the transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) into an aggressive lymphoma. Richter transformation is estimated to occur with a rate of 5-10% (1). In this article, we aimed to present a case of Richter transformation with central nervous system (CNS) involvement. In 2018, a 64-year-old woman who presented with lymphocytosis underwent flow cytometry examination and was diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). 6 cycles of Rituximab + Bendomustine treatment was administered. In 2024, the patient was admitted to the neurosurgery outpatient clinic with complaints of balance disorder, slowing of speech and facial slippage, and lesions were detected in the periventricular area at the level of basal ganglia in the brain (Figure 1). CSF examination did not reveal any findings in favour of lymphoma. A biopsy was taken from the intracranial mass. The biopsy result was reported as high-grade B- cell lymphoma. Transition from CHL to lymphoma was evaluated as Richter transformation. On PET CT examination, a 13*11 mm hyperdense lesion at the level of the left basal nucleus nucleus lentiformis, showing intense hyper metabolic activity compared to the surrounding parenchyma, showed central nervous system involvement of lymphoma. The patient was interned to the BMT ward and MATRIX protocol containing high-dose Ara-C and high-dose methotrexate with high CNS transmission was applied for a total of 3 cycles. Control brain imaging showed regression of the mass lesion observed in the previous examination. Central nervous system (CNS) infiltration is rare in Richter syndrome (RS). It has only been discussed at the case level (2). Various symptoms including headache, convulsions, diplopia, ataxia, facial paralysis and cognitive dysfunction are observed in these patients (3). In our patient, neurological findings including balance disorder, slowing of speech and facial slipping were observed. Central nervous system involvement was diagnosed by brain biopsy. When the literature is analysed, CNS involvement in these patients is very rare and usually demonstrated by CSF analysis. In a few patients, the diagnosis was made by brain biopsy as in our patient (3). In the literature, no optimal treatment has been reported in patients with Richter transformation with CNS involvement. Negative results have been shown despite treatments including high dose Methotrexate and Rituximab (1,2,3). In our case, successful results were obtained with MATRIX -C protocol including high dose Ara-C and high dose methotrexate. As a result of this treatment, regression was observed in control brain imaging. CONCLUSION: Richter transformation with CNS involvement is a rare but life-threatening condition. Close follow-up in the course of CLL, early diagnosis and initiation of appropriate chemotherapy may be life-saving. References: 1. PRONELLO, Edoardo, et al. Richter's syndrome of the central nervous system. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 2021, 48.6: 889-892. 2. Xu L, Song J Ch, Xiu H S, and et al. Richter's syndrome of the central nervous system diagnosed concurrently with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: A case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(41): e12701. 3. Nakanishi T, Ito T, Fujita Sh, etal. Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia with Central Nervous System Involvement: A Case Report with Literature Review. J Blood Med. 2020; 11: 487–502.Figure 1: Intracranial mass appearance on computed tomography of the brain (marked with red colour)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".