Editorial: Challenges and possibilities in Canadian education systems: Past, present, and future
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
For much of our last two years as the Canadian Journal of Education's Anglophone coeditors, we have focused on the important goals of decolonization and Indigenization in schooling and working collaboratively to improve educational experiences.The current issue delves into the ongoing challenges and possibilities of centering these goals in Canadian education systems and how the education community, including educators, students, parents, policymakers, and Elders, can work collaboratively to create more caring and anti-colonial futures together.As 2024 draws to an end, we hope this issue offers timely and critical research relevant to the education community and encourages reflection on the challenges and possibilities of schooling in Canada in the past, present, and future.In the article, "Disrupting colonial narratives of place: The q̓ íc̓ əy̓ Slough yesterday, today, and tomorrow project," Cher Hill, Rick Bailey, and Carman McKay demonstrate how educational opportunities can be created to centre wholistic and complex pedagogy based in Indigenous and post-humanist philosophies.Building on the vision of Elder Rick Bailey from the q̓ íc̓ əy̓ First Nation, the authors created a collaborative, artsbased educational project that brought students aged from five to 12 years to a land-based Editorial v Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation 47:4 (2024) www.cje-rce.calearning opportunity and vision-building activity.The students learned about how the q̓ íc̓ əy̓ Slough turned from a significant source of life to a degraded wasteland while also providing opportunities for students to relate differently in support of the Slough's futureThe authors provide detailed examples of how settler-colonial practices in agriculture and commercialization have degraded the waterway, which is intricately connected to the q̓ íc̓ əy̓ First Nation's ways of living.By educating children about colonial legacies and q̓ íc̓ əy̓ ways of responsibility and reciprocity to the land and more than human kin, this project teaches relational renewal between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people as well as with the land and kin.The authors' engagement with the students' artwork in community-based settings for broader educational purposes prompts us to rethink co-existence, respectful engagement, and living well together.In doing so, the authors suggest we may be able to (re)connect with land so that all beings can thrive.Centering Indigenous worldviews and philosophies in Canadian education systems is also central to the article, "Decolonizing history curricula across Canada: Recommendations for (re)design," by historians Sara Karn, Kristina R. Llewellyn, and Penney Clark.These authors share their nationwide project that interrogates history curricula in Canadian schools.In particular, the project focuses on the extent to which history curriculum across provinces and territories includes and integrates the local knowledges and histories of First Nations, Métis, and Inuit communities.Their project was motivated by the call to initiate and sustain decolonial curricular reform.They conducted a critical and systemic review of contemporary history curricula across Canada and provided ample evidence of how history education, including the teaching of existing knowledge and skills (to think and research), predominantly reinforces Eurocentrism and settler values, including the narratives of colonialism as "progress."Further, the authors note that students in history education across the country are encouraged to learn to take critical stances towards historical injustices such as the Holocaust, while curriculum overlooks and underrepresents the "cultural genocide" of Indigenous peoples in Canada, and the related resistances and agency undertaken by Indigenous peoples in response (p.1101).The authors acknowledge that more recent curricula in a post-TRC context are engaging more critically with colonialism; as such, they recommend paying greater attention to socially constructed and racially contested narratives of histories.The authors argue for increased engagement with Indigenous oral histories, knowledges, and worldviews through land-based and Elder-guided learning offering important guidance to educators.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,044 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,016 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,016 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,022 | 0,021 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».