Editorial: Challenges and possibilities in Canadian education systems: Past, present, and future
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For much of our last two years as the Canadian Journal of Education's Anglophone coeditors, we have focused on the important goals of decolonization and Indigenization in schooling and working collaboratively to improve educational experiences.The current issue delves into the ongoing challenges and possibilities of centering these goals in Canadian education systems and how the education community, including educators, students, parents, policymakers, and Elders, can work collaboratively to create more caring and anti-colonial futures together.As 2024 draws to an end, we hope this issue offers timely and critical research relevant to the education community and encourages reflection on the challenges and possibilities of schooling in Canada in the past, present, and future.In the article, "Disrupting colonial narratives of place: The q̓ íc̓ əy̓ Slough yesterday, today, and tomorrow project," Cher Hill, Rick Bailey, and Carman McKay demonstrate how educational opportunities can be created to centre wholistic and complex pedagogy based in Indigenous and post-humanist philosophies.Building on the vision of Elder Rick Bailey from the q̓ íc̓ əy̓ First Nation, the authors created a collaborative, artsbased educational project that brought students aged from five to 12 years to a land-based Editorial v Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation 47:4 (2024) www.cje-rce.calearning opportunity and vision-building activity.The students learned about how the q̓ íc̓ əy̓ Slough turned from a significant source of life to a degraded wasteland while also providing opportunities for students to relate differently in support of the Slough's futureThe authors provide detailed examples of how settler-colonial practices in agriculture and commercialization have degraded the waterway, which is intricately connected to the q̓ íc̓ əy̓ First Nation's ways of living.By educating children about colonial legacies and q̓ íc̓ əy̓ ways of responsibility and reciprocity to the land and more than human kin, this project teaches relational renewal between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people as well as with the land and kin.The authors' engagement with the students' artwork in community-based settings for broader educational purposes prompts us to rethink co-existence, respectful engagement, and living well together.In doing so, the authors suggest we may be able to (re)connect with land so that all beings can thrive.Centering Indigenous worldviews and philosophies in Canadian education systems is also central to the article, "Decolonizing history curricula across Canada: Recommendations for (re)design," by historians Sara Karn, Kristina R. Llewellyn, and Penney Clark.These authors share their nationwide project that interrogates history curricula in Canadian schools.In particular, the project focuses on the extent to which history curriculum across provinces and territories includes and integrates the local knowledges and histories of First Nations, Métis, and Inuit communities.Their project was motivated by the call to initiate and sustain decolonial curricular reform.They conducted a critical and systemic review of contemporary history curricula across Canada and provided ample evidence of how history education, including the teaching of existing knowledge and skills (to think and research), predominantly reinforces Eurocentrism and settler values, including the narratives of colonialism as "progress."Further, the authors note that students in history education across the country are encouraged to learn to take critical stances towards historical injustices such as the Holocaust, while curriculum overlooks and underrepresents the "cultural genocide" of Indigenous peoples in Canada, and the related resistances and agency undertaken by Indigenous peoples in response (p.1101).The authors acknowledge that more recent curricula in a post-TRC context are engaging more critically with colonialism; as such, they recommend paying greater attention to socially constructed and racially contested narratives of histories.The authors argue for increased engagement with Indigenous oral histories, knowledges, and worldviews through land-based and Elder-guided learning offering important guidance to educators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.044 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.022 | 0.021 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".