Understanding cerebral blood flow dynamics for Alzheimer’s disease prevention through acute exercise (flADex): Protocol for a randomized crossover trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Alterations in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and AD blood biomarkers are fundamental at early stages of AD. Exercise shows promise in delaying physiological changes, but its mechanisms for enhancing brain health remains unclear. FlADex aims to examine the acute effects of different exercise types on CBF and blood biomarkers in older adults. This protocol describes the methodology and rationale of flADex. METHODS FlADex is a counterbalanced crossover trial that will include 20 older adults aged 68 to 83 years old with negative brain amyloid status (<12 centiloid) and APOEε4 noncarriers. Participants will complete a 30-minute session of each condition in a randomized order: (i) moderate-intensity aerobic exercise (60-70% maximal heart rate), (ii) moderate-intensity resistance exercise (rating of perceived exertion: 4-6 points out of 10), and (iii) resting condition. Changes in the CBF is the primary outcome and will be assessed by magnetic resonance imaging using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling at pre- and at 3 timepoints post-condition (starting at 20, 27, 34 minutes). Secondary outcomes are biomarkers of AD pathology and neurodegeneration (Aβ42, Aβ40, p-tau217, p-tau181, BD-tau, GFAP, NfL) and growth factors (BDNF, IGF-1), measured through blood samples collected at pre- and post-condition (at 3, 50, 70 minutes). Moreover, cognitive outcomes and mood status will be measured pre- and post-condition. DISCUSSION FlADex will highlight the acute effects of exercise types on CBF and biomarkers before beta-amyloid accumulation. Acute effects on CBF dynamics and blood biomarkers are expected to be greater with aerobic than resistance exercise when compared to resting. CBF is expected to vary by brain region, and biomarkers to fluctuate dynamically post-exercise. This will provide critical insights into exercise impact on vascular and molecular pathways associated with AD pathology, and potential recommendations for standardized blood sampling to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Highlights Exercise may delay the development of AD, but its physiological mechanisms are unclear. flADex explores exercise-induced changes in CBF and blood biomarkers. 20 older adults will undergo a bout of aerobic, resistance exercise, and resting. CBF may increase more after aerobic exercise, with changes varying by brain region. Standardized rest conditions before blood sampling may enhance diagnostic accuracy. Declarations of interest TKK has consulted for Quanterix Corp., has received honoraria from the NIH for study section membership, and honoraria for speaker/grant review engagements from UPENN, UW-Madison, Advent Health, Brain Health conference, Barcelona-Pittsburgh conference and CQDM Canada, all outside of the submitted work. TKK has received blood biomarker data on defined research cohorts from Janssen and Alamar Biosciences for independent analysis and publication, with no financial incentive and/or research funding included. TKK is an inventor on patent # WO2020193500A1 and patent applications # 2450702-2, #63/693,956, # 63/679,361, and 63/672,952 .
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».