MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405967119 · doi:10.1101/2024.12.28.24319064

Understanding cerebral blood flow dynamics for Alzheimer’s disease prevention through acute exercise (flADex): Protocol for a randomized crossover trial

2024· preprint· en· W4405967119 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Isabel Martín‐Fuentes, Beatriz Fernandez‐Gamez, Sol Vidal‐Almela, Alfredo Caro‐Rus, Patricio Solis‐Urra, Lucía Sánchez‐Aranda, Jairo Alejandro Fernández Ortega, Javier Sanchez‐Martinez, Andrea Coca‐Pulido, Marcos Olvera‐Rojas, Emilio J. Barranco‐Moreno, Jose D. Marin‐Alvarez, Esmée A. Bakker, Ángel Toval, Darío Bellón, Alessandro Sclafani, Thomas K. Karikari, Kirk I. Erickson, Manuel Gómez-Río, Francisco B. Ortega, Irene Esteban‐Cornejo

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of HealthCHIST-ERAEuropean CommissionAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloAgenția Națională pentru Cercetare și DezvoltareQuébec Consortium for Drug DiscoveryUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsCerebral blood flowCrossoverMedicineRandomized controlled trialCrossover studyProtocol (science)DiseasePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyCardiologyInternal medicineComputer scienceAlternative medicinePathologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Alterations in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and AD blood biomarkers are fundamental at early stages of AD. Exercise shows promise in delaying physiological changes, but its mechanisms for enhancing brain health remains unclear. FlADex aims to examine the acute effects of different exercise types on CBF and blood biomarkers in older adults. This protocol describes the methodology and rationale of flADex. METHODS FlADex is a counterbalanced crossover trial that will include 20 older adults aged 68 to 83 years old with negative brain amyloid status (<12 centiloid) and APOEε4 noncarriers. Participants will complete a 30-minute session of each condition in a randomized order: (i) moderate-intensity aerobic exercise (60-70% maximal heart rate), (ii) moderate-intensity resistance exercise (rating of perceived exertion: 4-6 points out of 10), and (iii) resting condition. Changes in the CBF is the primary outcome and will be assessed by magnetic resonance imaging using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling at pre- and at 3 timepoints post-condition (starting at 20, 27, 34 minutes). Secondary outcomes are biomarkers of AD pathology and neurodegeneration (Aβ42, Aβ40, p-tau217, p-tau181, BD-tau, GFAP, NfL) and growth factors (BDNF, IGF-1), measured through blood samples collected at pre- and post-condition (at 3, 50, 70 minutes). Moreover, cognitive outcomes and mood status will be measured pre- and post-condition. DISCUSSION FlADex will highlight the acute effects of exercise types on CBF and biomarkers before beta-amyloid accumulation. Acute effects on CBF dynamics and blood biomarkers are expected to be greater with aerobic than resistance exercise when compared to resting. CBF is expected to vary by brain region, and biomarkers to fluctuate dynamically post-exercise. This will provide critical insights into exercise impact on vascular and molecular pathways associated with AD pathology, and potential recommendations for standardized blood sampling to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Highlights Exercise may delay the development of AD, but its physiological mechanisms are unclear. flADex explores exercise-induced changes in CBF and blood biomarkers. 20 older adults will undergo a bout of aerobic, resistance exercise, and resting. CBF may increase more after aerobic exercise, with changes varying by brain region. Standardized rest conditions before blood sampling may enhance diagnostic accuracy. Declarations of interest TKK has consulted for Quanterix Corp., has received honoraria from the NIH for study section membership, and honoraria for speaker/grant review engagements from UPENN, UW-Madison, Advent Health, Brain Health conference, Barcelona-Pittsburgh conference and CQDM Canada, all outside of the submitted work. TKK has received blood biomarker data on defined research cohorts from Janssen and Alamar Biosciences for independent analysis and publication, with no financial incentive and/or research funding included. TKK is an inventor on patent # WO2020193500A1 and patent applications # 2450702-2, #63/693,956, # 63/679,361, and 63/672,952 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.381
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingFrench-language works237,207