GREENING OF DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES IN THE FIELD OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The article is devoted to the formation of tasks and development of mechanisms for taking into account environmental criteria in the field of public procurement. A review of program and strategic documents is conducted that address the need to develop the field of public procurement in the context of limiting the impact of factors harmful to health, preserving the quality of natural resources and new approaches in public administration. The article draws attention to the potential of the Aarhus Convention and highlights certain aspects for improving the practice of interaction with the public. It is also noted that the institutionalization of public participation in decision-making was embodied in the discussions of draft regulatory legal acts, projects for the construction of industrial, infrastructure and other facilities. The Law «On Public Procurement» of 2024, which will come into force at the beginning of 2025, is analyzed. The article also provides the EU experience, in particular, the relevant acts on the issue of state (public) procurement to improve the environment are studied. An analysis was carried out, the need for which is dictated by the objectives of the study; it covers foreign practice in regulating and implementing «green» procurement in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Germany, Canada, the United States of America and Australia. A conclusion is made about the justification for involving the public in decision-making at the stage of setting the problem and planning the development of the corresponding solution for a full consideration of alternative solutions, including consideration of several such options simultaneously. It is noted that the analysis of foreign experience shows the presence of significant potential for the development of greening tools in the field of public procurement, and also demonstrates examples for the development and implementation of effective mechanisms for green procurement, adapting them to the legal system and economic structure of the country. The authors emphasize that public participation in decision-making, access to information and justice have a constitutional and legal content and can be traced in industry legislation. Attention is paid to the Basic Law of the state, which acts as a conceptual document and enshrines the value and legal vectors of regulating public relations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle