MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

GREENING OF DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES IN THE FIELD OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT

2024· article· en· W4406073137 on OpenAlex
Marat Amradinovich Alenov, Yerbol Abayevich Dyussenov

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicPublic Procurement and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcurementGreeningField (mathematics)BusinessPolitical scienceMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is devoted to the formation of tasks and development of mechanisms for taking into account environmental criteria in the field of public procurement. A review of program and strategic documents is conducted that address the need to develop the field of public procurement in the context of limiting the impact of factors harmful to health, preserving the quality of natural resources and new approaches in public administration. The article draws attention to the potential of the Aarhus Convention and highlights certain aspects for improving the practice of interaction with the public. It is also noted that the institutionalization of public participation in decision-making was embodied in the discussions of draft regulatory legal acts, projects for the construction of industrial, infrastructure and other facilities. The Law «On Public Procurement» of 2024, which will come into force at the beginning of 2025, is analyzed. The article also provides the EU experience, in particular, the relevant acts on the issue of state (public) procurement to improve the environment are studied. An analysis was carried out, the need for which is dictated by the objectives of the study; it covers foreign practice in regulating and implementing «green» procurement in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Germany, Canada, the United States of America and Australia. A conclusion is made about the justification for involving the public in decision-making at the stage of setting the problem and planning the development of the corresponding solution for a full consideration of alternative solutions, including consideration of several such options simultaneously. It is noted that the analysis of foreign experience shows the presence of significant potential for the development of greening tools in the field of public procurement, and also demonstrates examples for the development and implementation of effective mechanisms for green procurement, adapting them to the legal system and economic structure of the country. The authors emphasize that public participation in decision-making, access to information and justice have a constitutional and legal content and can be traced in industry legislation. Attention is paid to the Basic Law of the state, which acts as a conceptual document and enshrines the value and legal vectors of regulating public relations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it