MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4406095567 · doi:10.5325/weslmethstud.17.1.0106

Handbook for the Christian Faith: Essential Beliefs and Practices for Twenty-First-Century American Methodists and Like-Minded Protestants. A Book about Extraordinary People

2025· article· en· W4406095567 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jennifer Woodruff Tait

Notice bibliographique

RevueWesley and Methodist Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFaithChristian faithReligious studiesPsychologySociologyHistoryTheologyGerontologyMedicinePhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Handbook for the Christian Faith is a compendium of reflections on the Christian faith—explicitly Protestant, fundamentally Methodist, and contextually American—representing the things James Dawsey feels are most important for members of United Methodist local churches to know as they face the challenges of the twenty-first century. Dawsey is Professor and Wolfe Chair of Religious Studies at Emory and Henry University, where he has taught undergraduates for a number of years, and he is also a retired United Methodist minister. He has published widely in the areas of biblical studies and theology, as well as releasing several novels.Dawsey’s book is divided into five sections: an opening section, which discusses preparation for the gospel through awareness of our own sin and the moral law; a section called ‘The Door of Religion’, which explains the process of becoming converted and pressing on toward perfection; a section on epistemology, which describes how we know the truth about God and the world, most especially through becoming better readers of the scriptures, but also through understanding church history, using reason, and finding a proper place for the lessons of Christian experience; a section about the history of Methodism as an inclusionary movement, touching on issues of gender, racism, and sexuality; and a final section on the Church’s mission and the United Methodist Church’s structure.It is hard to pinhole the book into any one theological discipline; it lives up to its name in being a handbook to many of them. Dawsey leads readers through the history of the Church, especially the Methodist movement, exegetes the scriptures at length, reflects continually on Christian doctrine, and tells modern-day anecdotes that would not be out of place in a sermon. Sidebars give illustrative stories, definitions, excerpts from Christian writings, and questions to ponder; occasional illustrations illuminate the text (although I sometimes wondered why they were placed in the specific locations where they ended up). Each chapter ends with a section called ‘Where Do We Go From Here?’, which lists practical lessons to be learned for modern local churches from the particular aspect of history, doctrine, or polity under discussion.Dawsey intended the work to be used most profitably as a basis for group discussion (15), and he includes study questions aimed at helping local churches process the information, as well as short bibliographies with additional reading suggestions. The longer bibliography at the end, being completely alphabetical rather than topical, is of more limited use by the layperson. The overall impression is one of having sat down at a good fireside with Dawsey and sharing a cup of tea while he saunters through 2,000 years of the faith and picks out the gems most likely to inspire, challenge, and educate a modern congregation.It is clear from the Handbook that Dawsey hoped his book could help ward off the United Methodist split that was looming while he was writing, inspiring his denomination to come together in mission, catechetical activities, discipleship, and social action, even while holding differing views on sexuality. His extraordinarily centrist book—socially forward-looking, doctrinally and exegetically traditionalist—actually lands in post-schism United/Global Methodism, and I am afraid that it may not find the audience he hopes for. If a local church (presumably one in the United States given the book’s Americentric focus) does decide to use it for study and discernment, they will find many helpful reflections as they consider how to minister to their context in the days ahead.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,951
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,004
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,042
Tête enseignante GPT0,418
Écart entre enseignants0,376 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueWesley and Methodist StudiesMême sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsTravaux en français237 207