MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Handbook for the Christian Faith: Essential Beliefs and Practices for Twenty-First-Century American Methodists and Like-Minded Protestants. A Book about Extraordinary People

2025· article· en· W4406095567 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jennifer Woodruff Tait

Bibliographic record

VenueWesley and Methodist Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaithChristian faithReligious studiesPsychologySociologyHistoryTheologyGerontologyMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Handbook for the Christian Faith is a compendium of reflections on the Christian faith—explicitly Protestant, fundamentally Methodist, and contextually American—representing the things James Dawsey feels are most important for members of United Methodist local churches to know as they face the challenges of the twenty-first century. Dawsey is Professor and Wolfe Chair of Religious Studies at Emory and Henry University, where he has taught undergraduates for a number of years, and he is also a retired United Methodist minister. He has published widely in the areas of biblical studies and theology, as well as releasing several novels.Dawsey’s book is divided into five sections: an opening section, which discusses preparation for the gospel through awareness of our own sin and the moral law; a section called ‘The Door of Religion’, which explains the process of becoming converted and pressing on toward perfection; a section on epistemology, which describes how we know the truth about God and the world, most especially through becoming better readers of the scriptures, but also through understanding church history, using reason, and finding a proper place for the lessons of Christian experience; a section about the history of Methodism as an inclusionary movement, touching on issues of gender, racism, and sexuality; and a final section on the Church’s mission and the United Methodist Church’s structure.It is hard to pinhole the book into any one theological discipline; it lives up to its name in being a handbook to many of them. Dawsey leads readers through the history of the Church, especially the Methodist movement, exegetes the scriptures at length, reflects continually on Christian doctrine, and tells modern-day anecdotes that would not be out of place in a sermon. Sidebars give illustrative stories, definitions, excerpts from Christian writings, and questions to ponder; occasional illustrations illuminate the text (although I sometimes wondered why they were placed in the specific locations where they ended up). Each chapter ends with a section called ‘Where Do We Go From Here?’, which lists practical lessons to be learned for modern local churches from the particular aspect of history, doctrine, or polity under discussion.Dawsey intended the work to be used most profitably as a basis for group discussion (15), and he includes study questions aimed at helping local churches process the information, as well as short bibliographies with additional reading suggestions. The longer bibliography at the end, being completely alphabetical rather than topical, is of more limited use by the layperson. The overall impression is one of having sat down at a good fireside with Dawsey and sharing a cup of tea while he saunters through 2,000 years of the faith and picks out the gems most likely to inspire, challenge, and educate a modern congregation.It is clear from the Handbook that Dawsey hoped his book could help ward off the United Methodist split that was looming while he was writing, inspiring his denomination to come together in mission, catechetical activities, discipleship, and social action, even while holding differing views on sexuality. His extraordinarily centrist book—socially forward-looking, doctrinally and exegetically traditionalist—actually lands in post-schism United/Global Methodism, and I am afraid that it may not find the audience he hopes for. If a local church (presumably one in the United States given the book’s Americentric focus) does decide to use it for study and discernment, they will find many helpful reflections as they consider how to minister to their context in the days ahead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWesley and Methodist StudiesSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207