Factors enabling smooth transitions from out-of-home care: A scoping review
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Young people in out-of-home care (OOHC) may face health, educational and social disadvantage due to experiencing childhood adversity. When young people transition from OOHC at 18 years of age it is recognised that this experience of disadvantage continues and is often compounded, with care leavers at risk of poor outcomes post-transition. While governments and community service organisations support young people to plan to leave OOHC, this transition to independence occurs significantly earlier than in the general population and with less support. Previous research has identified the reasons behind poor post-care outcomes but there is a knowledge gap concerning how transition planning could be improved. A scoping review of the Australian and international empirical grey literature (non-commercial or academic publications) was conducted with the aim of identifying the key factors that enable smooth transitions from OOHC, including for Indigenous populations. The search strategy involved (1) targeted searches on Google and child welfare organisation websites, (2) a child welfare database and (3) consultation with content experts. Empirical literature published in English from 2018 onwards was included. Following the screening process, 45 reports were included in the review. There were 16 reports from Australia, 13 from the United States of America, 6 from Canada, 4 from New Zealand, 4 from the United Kingdom, one international and one multi-national African study. Seventeen key themes outlining factors that contribute to smooth transitions from OOHC were identified in this review. Themes common to all care leavers (both Indigenous and non-Indigenous) included: tailored, long-term and comprehensive case management; active and meaningful involvement of young people; access to affordable housing; supportive social relationships; supportive relationships with professionals; access to post-care support; cross-sector collaboration; system factors; extended care in line with social norms; OOHC policy; individual strengths of young people; quality and stability of placements; and education and employment. Themes unique to Indigenous care leavers included: culturally appropriate support; Indigenous-led services; connection to culture; and suitable placement location. The findings of this review have implications for research, policy and practice and provide much-needed guidance for the advancement of effective transition pathways for young people living in OOHC.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle