MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4406379617 · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1533863

Editorial: Interdisciplinary or interprofessional learning as catalyst of change in healthcare and higher education

2025· editorial· en· W4406379617 sur OpenAlexaff
Nahla Gomaa, Diane H. Quinn, Aubrey H. Wang

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Education · 2025
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHealth careInterprofessional educationMedical educationEngineering ethicsKnowledge managementEngineering managementComputer scienceEngineeringMedicinePolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

education, which involves students from different healthcare disciplines working together in training (3) , remain ambiguous (4) education pedagogies within higher education. With limited studies on the global impact of innovative collaborative pedagogies within higher education and healthcare education this research topic was necessary. We also saw this research topic as a "catalyst of change"; a change that can engage, communicate, and coordinate with stakeholders; bringing them successfully along the change journey.We asked authors to describe how they developed and tested new ways of teaching that bring together different fields and professional groups in healthcare and education. We were especially interested in articles that showed how collaborative teaching methods can help global higher education educators, students and leaders prepare for future challenges.To ensure the quality of the selected articles, we created a careful review process to improve the selected articles and enhance their impact. The four-step process is briefly depicted in this figure (1). We first screened the abstracts and redirected those that did not match the criteria to other educational topics. For the selected studies, we provided 2-4 rounds of constructive feedback to help the authors improve the impact of their study through careful revisions. We adopted a transparent process for documentation, and our final decision was always a committee's decision.The accepted five articles presented innovative interdisciplinary or interprofessional education approaches along the continuum of secondary, college, professional education and practice to the global education and healthcare fields. We summarized each article below.Ikavalko et al. (5) used a Problem-Based Learning [PBL] course to bridge the gap between upper secondary and higher education which served as a pedagogical catalyst of change.This article particularly highlighted an innovative interdisciplinary approach for pre-service teachers interested in teaching science education at the secondary level and for secondary students interested in studying science education. It illustrated the interdisciplinary nature with multidisciplinary groups of the pre-service teachers creating the Global Challenges upper secondary course over a university semester. The upper secondary students received the University-student created Global Challenges course as a 6 week-course with multiple collaborative pedagogies. Both the university and upper secondary students were surveyed to assess the impact of the experiences on their learning and themes were summarized in the article. Phillips et al.'s (6) article presented Community colleges, which serve a substantial percentage of students in the United States. They presented an innovative Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics [STEM] education program-a day-long, cross-disciplinary experiential learning event to increase community college students' awareness of accessible applied mathematics disciplines and future career options. Experiential learning is a high-impact pedagogical practice whereby knowledge is created through the transformation of experience; helping students make connections between the material being learned and workforce skills; increasing engagement with mathematics and science to improve attitudes toward mathematics and science content and careers. This study described an annual one-day event that promoted collaboration of 10 separate disciplines, three campus partnerships, and six community partnerships to create over 25 interactive exhibits around the central theme of math and forensics. Best practices were shared to help other higher education institutions to replicate this innovation in their context. Sujir et al. (7) highlighted a new model of interprofessional education [IPE] offered to Indian dental students during their internship. These students, acquainted with considerable clinical knowledge, would have attained readiness to master additional competencies and empower their complex clinical practices. The elective course accentuated the importance of backward thinking to enhance competencies not achieved through a regular curriculum. The needs assessment surveys vetted competencies were narrowed down to: 1) Business Management, 2) Finance, 3) Marketing, 4) Human resource management, 5) Patient management, 6) Instrument and equipment purchase and maintenance, 7) Clinic design, 8) Legal aspects, 9) Ethics. This model engaged dental practitioners, dental educators, business experts, lawyers, bioethicists, engineers, and architects to teach practice management education through IP collaboration perfectly timed to the start point of clinical practice. The course outcome also utilized important indicators that were pivotal to each competency, and the program evaluation was collected both from participating students and practitioners to cover different feedback facets. Bahattab et al. (8) plotted the frequent, prolonged, and severe humanitarian crises, affecting 1 in every 23 people today, with an increasing demand for the professionalization of Bizarria et al. (9) conducted a narrative literature review to argue about the urgency of curricularization of cross-cultural management in higher education institutions in Brazil. They posit that the increase in digitalization, globalization, mobility, and polarization have ignited this sense of urgency. The review foregrounded studies on cross-cultural management across various industries (e.g., business, healthcare, technology, etc.) and countries/regions of the world. Their thematic analysis revealed the trends of: (i) digital transformation and virtual education; (ii) learning, connectivism and formative experience; (iii) knowledge management and communities of practice; and (iv) conflict management. They concluded that the field needs to embrace intercultural sensitivity as an essential skill for leading global teams. This is especially important in times of polarization, when intolerance of differences has proven challenging. Leaders should reflect with openness and empathy on the different worldviews and paradigms of cross-cultural management.Each of these articles illustrates how interdisciplinary and interprofessional education pedagogy could be applied to the global higher education or healthcare fields. While each of these studies have different limitations, as a collection, they illustrate new ways of teaching and training that can bring together different fields and professional groups in healthcare and education.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesIntégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,086
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,458
Écart entre enseignants0,437 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in EducationMême sujetInterprofessional Education and CollaborationTravaux en français237 207