MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406379617 · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1533863

Editorial: Interdisciplinary or interprofessional learning as catalyst of change in healthcare and higher education

2025· editorial· en· W4406379617 on OpenAlexaff
Nahla Gomaa, Diane H. Quinn, Aubrey H. Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Education · 2025
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careInterprofessional educationMedical educationEngineering ethicsKnowledge managementEngineering managementComputer scienceEngineeringMedicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

education, which involves students from different healthcare disciplines working together in training (3) , remain ambiguous (4) education pedagogies within higher education. With limited studies on the global impact of innovative collaborative pedagogies within higher education and healthcare education this research topic was necessary. We also saw this research topic as a "catalyst of change"; a change that can engage, communicate, and coordinate with stakeholders; bringing them successfully along the change journey.We asked authors to describe how they developed and tested new ways of teaching that bring together different fields and professional groups in healthcare and education. We were especially interested in articles that showed how collaborative teaching methods can help global higher education educators, students and leaders prepare for future challenges.To ensure the quality of the selected articles, we created a careful review process to improve the selected articles and enhance their impact. The four-step process is briefly depicted in this figure (1). We first screened the abstracts and redirected those that did not match the criteria to other educational topics. For the selected studies, we provided 2-4 rounds of constructive feedback to help the authors improve the impact of their study through careful revisions. We adopted a transparent process for documentation, and our final decision was always a committee's decision.The accepted five articles presented innovative interdisciplinary or interprofessional education approaches along the continuum of secondary, college, professional education and practice to the global education and healthcare fields. We summarized each article below.Ikavalko et al. (5) used a Problem-Based Learning [PBL] course to bridge the gap between upper secondary and higher education which served as a pedagogical catalyst of change.This article particularly highlighted an innovative interdisciplinary approach for pre-service teachers interested in teaching science education at the secondary level and for secondary students interested in studying science education. It illustrated the interdisciplinary nature with multidisciplinary groups of the pre-service teachers creating the Global Challenges upper secondary course over a university semester. The upper secondary students received the University-student created Global Challenges course as a 6 week-course with multiple collaborative pedagogies. Both the university and upper secondary students were surveyed to assess the impact of the experiences on their learning and themes were summarized in the article. Phillips et al.'s (6) article presented Community colleges, which serve a substantial percentage of students in the United States. They presented an innovative Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics [STEM] education program-a day-long, cross-disciplinary experiential learning event to increase community college students' awareness of accessible applied mathematics disciplines and future career options. Experiential learning is a high-impact pedagogical practice whereby knowledge is created through the transformation of experience; helping students make connections between the material being learned and workforce skills; increasing engagement with mathematics and science to improve attitudes toward mathematics and science content and careers. This study described an annual one-day event that promoted collaboration of 10 separate disciplines, three campus partnerships, and six community partnerships to create over 25 interactive exhibits around the central theme of math and forensics. Best practices were shared to help other higher education institutions to replicate this innovation in their context. Sujir et al. (7) highlighted a new model of interprofessional education [IPE] offered to Indian dental students during their internship. These students, acquainted with considerable clinical knowledge, would have attained readiness to master additional competencies and empower their complex clinical practices. The elective course accentuated the importance of backward thinking to enhance competencies not achieved through a regular curriculum. The needs assessment surveys vetted competencies were narrowed down to: 1) Business Management, 2) Finance, 3) Marketing, 4) Human resource management, 5) Patient management, 6) Instrument and equipment purchase and maintenance, 7) Clinic design, 8) Legal aspects, 9) Ethics. This model engaged dental practitioners, dental educators, business experts, lawyers, bioethicists, engineers, and architects to teach practice management education through IP collaboration perfectly timed to the start point of clinical practice. The course outcome also utilized important indicators that were pivotal to each competency, and the program evaluation was collected both from participating students and practitioners to cover different feedback facets. Bahattab et al. (8) plotted the frequent, prolonged, and severe humanitarian crises, affecting 1 in every 23 people today, with an increasing demand for the professionalization of Bizarria et al. (9) conducted a narrative literature review to argue about the urgency of curricularization of cross-cultural management in higher education institutions in Brazil. They posit that the increase in digitalization, globalization, mobility, and polarization have ignited this sense of urgency. The review foregrounded studies on cross-cultural management across various industries (e.g., business, healthcare, technology, etc.) and countries/regions of the world. Their thematic analysis revealed the trends of: (i) digital transformation and virtual education; (ii) learning, connectivism and formative experience; (iii) knowledge management and communities of practice; and (iv) conflict management. They concluded that the field needs to embrace intercultural sensitivity as an essential skill for leading global teams. This is especially important in times of polarization, when intolerance of differences has proven challenging. Leaders should reflect with openness and empathy on the different worldviews and paradigms of cross-cultural management.Each of these articles illustrates how interdisciplinary and interprofessional education pedagogy could be applied to the global higher education or healthcare fields. While each of these studies have different limitations, as a collection, they illustrate new ways of teaching and training that can bring together different fields and professional groups in healthcare and education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.437 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in EducationSame topicInterprofessional Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207