A Genetic Model for the Biggenden Gold-Bearing Fe Skarn Deposit, Queensland, Australia: Geology, Mineralogy, Isotope Geochemistry, and Fluid Inclusion Studies
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Biggenden gold-bearing Fe skarn deposit in southeast Queensland, Australia, is a calcic magnetite skarn that has been mined for Fe and gold (from the upper portion of the deposit). Skarn has replaced volcanic and sedimentary rocks of the Early Permian Gympie Group, which formed in different tectonic settings, including island arc, back arc, and mid-ocean ridge. This group has experienced a hornblende-hornfels grade of contact metamorphism due to the intrusion of the Late Triassic Degilbo Granite. The intrusion is a mildly oxidized I-type monzogranite that has geochemical characteristics intermediate between those of granitoids typically associated with Fe-Cu-Au and Sn-W-Mo skarn deposits. The skarn mineralogy indicates that there was an evolution from prograde to various retrograde assemblages. Prograde garnet (Adr11-99Grs1-78Alm0-8Sps0-11), clinopyroxene (Di30-92Hd7-65Jo0-9), magnetite, and scapolite formed initially. Epidote and Cl-bearing amphibole (mainly ferropargasite) were the early retrograde minerals, followed by chlorite, calcite, actinolite, quartz, and sulfides. Late-stage retrograde reactions are indicated by the development of nontronite, calcite, and quartz. Gold is mainly associated with sulfide minerals in the retrograde sulfide stage. The fluids in equilibrium with the ore-stage calcites had δ13C and δ18O values that indicate deposition from magmatically derived fluids. The calculated δ18O values of the fluids in equilibrium with the skarn magnetite also suggest a magmatic origin. However, the fluids in equilibrium with epidote were a mixture of magmatic and meteoric water, and the fluids that deposited chlorite were at least partly meteoric. δD values for the retrograde amphibole and epidote fall within the common range for magmatic water. Late-stage chlorite was deposited from metasomatic fluids depleted in deuterium (D), implying a meteoric water origin. Sulfur isotopic compositions of the Biggenden sulfides are similar to other skarn deposits worldwide and indicate that sulfur was most probably derived from a magmatic source. Based on the strontium (87Sr/86Sr) and lead (206Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb and 208Pb/204Pb) isotope ratios, the volcanic and sedimentary rocks of the Gympie Group may have contributed part of the metals to the hydrothermal fluids. Lead isotope data are also consistent with a close age relationship between the mineralization at Biggenden and the crystallization of the Degilbo Granite. Microthermometric analysis indicates that there is an overall decrease in fluid temperature and salinity from the prograde skarn to retrograde alterations. Fluid inclusions in prograde skarn calcite and garnet yield homogenization temperatures of 500 to 600 °C and have salinities up to 45 equivalent wt % NaCl. Fluid inclusions in quartz and calcite from the retrograde sulfide-stage homogenized between 280 and 360 °C and have lower salinities (5–15 equivalent wt % NaCl). In a favored genetic model, hydrothermal fluids originated from the Degilbo Granite at depth and migrated through the shear zone, intrusive contact, and permeable Gympie Group rocks and leached extra Fe and Ca and deposited magnetite upon reaction with the adjacent marble and basalt.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».