A Genetic Model for the Biggenden Gold-Bearing Fe Skarn Deposit, Queensland, Australia: Geology, Mineralogy, Isotope Geochemistry, and Fluid Inclusion Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Biggenden gold-bearing Fe skarn deposit in southeast Queensland, Australia, is a calcic magnetite skarn that has been mined for Fe and gold (from the upper portion of the deposit). Skarn has replaced volcanic and sedimentary rocks of the Early Permian Gympie Group, which formed in different tectonic settings, including island arc, back arc, and mid-ocean ridge. This group has experienced a hornblende-hornfels grade of contact metamorphism due to the intrusion of the Late Triassic Degilbo Granite. The intrusion is a mildly oxidized I-type monzogranite that has geochemical characteristics intermediate between those of granitoids typically associated with Fe-Cu-Au and Sn-W-Mo skarn deposits. The skarn mineralogy indicates that there was an evolution from prograde to various retrograde assemblages. Prograde garnet (Adr11-99Grs1-78Alm0-8Sps0-11), clinopyroxene (Di30-92Hd7-65Jo0-9), magnetite, and scapolite formed initially. Epidote and Cl-bearing amphibole (mainly ferropargasite) were the early retrograde minerals, followed by chlorite, calcite, actinolite, quartz, and sulfides. Late-stage retrograde reactions are indicated by the development of nontronite, calcite, and quartz. Gold is mainly associated with sulfide minerals in the retrograde sulfide stage. The fluids in equilibrium with the ore-stage calcites had δ13C and δ18O values that indicate deposition from magmatically derived fluids. The calculated δ18O values of the fluids in equilibrium with the skarn magnetite also suggest a magmatic origin. However, the fluids in equilibrium with epidote were a mixture of magmatic and meteoric water, and the fluids that deposited chlorite were at least partly meteoric. δD values for the retrograde amphibole and epidote fall within the common range for magmatic water. Late-stage chlorite was deposited from metasomatic fluids depleted in deuterium (D), implying a meteoric water origin. Sulfur isotopic compositions of the Biggenden sulfides are similar to other skarn deposits worldwide and indicate that sulfur was most probably derived from a magmatic source. Based on the strontium (87Sr/86Sr) and lead (206Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb and 208Pb/204Pb) isotope ratios, the volcanic and sedimentary rocks of the Gympie Group may have contributed part of the metals to the hydrothermal fluids. Lead isotope data are also consistent with a close age relationship between the mineralization at Biggenden and the crystallization of the Degilbo Granite. Microthermometric analysis indicates that there is an overall decrease in fluid temperature and salinity from the prograde skarn to retrograde alterations. Fluid inclusions in prograde skarn calcite and garnet yield homogenization temperatures of 500 to 600 °C and have salinities up to 45 equivalent wt % NaCl. Fluid inclusions in quartz and calcite from the retrograde sulfide-stage homogenized between 280 and 360 °C and have lower salinities (5–15 equivalent wt % NaCl). In a favored genetic model, hydrothermal fluids originated from the Degilbo Granite at depth and migrated through the shear zone, intrusive contact, and permeable Gympie Group rocks and leached extra Fe and Ca and deposited magnetite upon reaction with the adjacent marble and basalt.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".