P0795 Clinical symptoms, C-reactive protein and albumin at admission to hospital poorly correlate with refractoriness to intravenous steroids in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis – posthoc analysis of the IASO trial
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Intravenous corticosteroids (IVCS) remain the cornerstone of treatment for patients admitted to hospital with Acute Severe Ulcerative colitis (ASUC). Unfortunately, up to one third of patients do not respond to IVCS and need medical or surgical rescue treatment. Identifying patients who are unlikely to respond to IVCS at the point of admission would be clinically relevant since these patients could be offered early rescue treatment, potentially reducing morbidity. Methods This was a post-hoc analysis of a UK multicentre, randomised placebo-controlled trial of Interleukin 1 blockade in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (the IASO trial).1,2 The intervention group did not differ from placebo treated patients in terms of need for rescue therapy or colectomy. Therefore we pooled both groups in this post-hoc analysis. We studied whether clinical symptoms as captured by the modified Truelove and Witts severity index (MTWSI) or its individual components or biochemical parameters at admission to hospital could predict response to IVCS. Results Among 106 randomised patients 68/106 (64%) patients responded to IVCS. 38/106 (36%) were non-responders to IVCS and needed medical rescue treatment (32 infliximab, 6 ciclosporin). Median time to rescue therapy was 4 days (interquartile range: 3-6 days). We observed no differences in baseline MTWSI score or in its individual components (Figure 1) between IVCS responders compared to IVCS non-responders. Baseline median C-reactive protein (CRP) (31.9 mg/L Vs 29.5 mg/L, p= 0.8) and baseline median albumin (36.5 g/L vs 35.0 g/L, p=0.4) were similar between IVCS responders and non-responders. Numerically, patients with higher baseline albumin were less likely to be non-responders to IVCS (upper quartile serum albumin: ≥40.0 g/L, non-responders 23% vs lower 3 quartiles 39% non-responders; p=0.17). 9 patients needed colectomy by day 98, all of whom had a baseline albumin below this threshold. Sensitivity analyses restricted to subpopulations of patients already on oral steroids at admission, those with a new diagnosis of ulcerative colitis, and those randomised to placebo vs anakinra yielded similar results. Conclusion Baseline clinical symptoms at hospitalisation (modified Truelove and Witts severity index and its individual components) and biochemical parameters (CRP and albumin) did not identify patients refractory to IVCS in the IASO trial. These findings suggest that response to IVCS in ASUC cannot be predicted from baseline clinical symptoms and biochemical parameters at admission to hospital. All colectomies occurred in patients with baseline albumin below 40 g/L. References 1.Thomas, M. G. et al. Trial summary and protocol for a phase II randomised placebo-controlled double-blinded trial of Interleukin 1 blockade in Acute Severe Colitis: the IASO trial. BMJ Open 9, e023765 (2019). 2.Raine, T. et al. OP33 Results of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate Interleukin 1 blockade with anakinra in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (IASO). J. Crohns Colitis 17, i43–i46 (2023).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle