MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406698592 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae190.0969

P0795 Clinical symptoms, C-reactive protein and albumin at admission to hospital poorly correlate with refractoriness to intravenous steroids in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis – posthoc analysis of the IASO trial

2025· article· en· W4406698592 on OpenAlexaff
David Drobne, S Vaja, Wendi Qian, Holly Pavey, S Subramanian, Biljana Brezina, Alan Steel, Ally Speight, Christopher A Lamb, Shaji Sebastian, Shahida Din, I. Arnott, James Galea, Philip Hendy, C Selinger, Helen Steed, Vipul Jairath, Miles Parkes, Arthur Kaser, Tim Raine

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisC-reactive proteinAlbuminInternal medicineClinical trialGastroenterologyInflammationDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Intravenous corticosteroids (IVCS) remain the cornerstone of treatment for patients admitted to hospital with Acute Severe Ulcerative colitis (ASUC). Unfortunately, up to one third of patients do not respond to IVCS and need medical or surgical rescue treatment. Identifying patients who are unlikely to respond to IVCS at the point of admission would be clinically relevant since these patients could be offered early rescue treatment, potentially reducing morbidity. Methods This was a post-hoc analysis of a UK multicentre, randomised placebo-controlled trial of Interleukin 1 blockade in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (the IASO trial).1,2 The intervention group did not differ from placebo treated patients in terms of need for rescue therapy or colectomy. Therefore we pooled both groups in this post-hoc analysis. We studied whether clinical symptoms as captured by the modified Truelove and Witts severity index (MTWSI) or its individual components or biochemical parameters at admission to hospital could predict response to IVCS. Results Among 106 randomised patients 68/106 (64%) patients responded to IVCS. 38/106 (36%) were non-responders to IVCS and needed medical rescue treatment (32 infliximab, 6 ciclosporin). Median time to rescue therapy was 4 days (interquartile range: 3-6 days). We observed no differences in baseline MTWSI score or in its individual components (Figure 1) between IVCS responders compared to IVCS non-responders. Baseline median C-reactive protein (CRP) (31.9 mg/L Vs 29.5 mg/L, p= 0.8) and baseline median albumin (36.5 g/L vs 35.0 g/L, p=0.4) were similar between IVCS responders and non-responders. Numerically, patients with higher baseline albumin were less likely to be non-responders to IVCS (upper quartile serum albumin: ≥40.0 g/L, non-responders 23% vs lower 3 quartiles 39% non-responders; p=0.17). 9 patients needed colectomy by day 98, all of whom had a baseline albumin below this threshold. Sensitivity analyses restricted to subpopulations of patients already on oral steroids at admission, those with a new diagnosis of ulcerative colitis, and those randomised to placebo vs anakinra yielded similar results. Conclusion Baseline clinical symptoms at hospitalisation (modified Truelove and Witts severity index and its individual components) and biochemical parameters (CRP and albumin) did not identify patients refractory to IVCS in the IASO trial. These findings suggest that response to IVCS in ASUC cannot be predicted from baseline clinical symptoms and biochemical parameters at admission to hospital. All colectomies occurred in patients with baseline albumin below 40 g/L. References 1.Thomas, M. G. et al. Trial summary and protocol for a phase II randomised placebo-controlled double-blinded trial of Interleukin 1 blockade in Acute Severe Colitis: the IASO trial. BMJ Open 9, e023765 (2019). 2.Raine, T. et al. OP33 Results of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate Interleukin 1 blockade with anakinra in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (IASO). J. Crohns Colitis 17, i43–i46 (2023).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.005
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicMicroscopic ColitisFrench-language works237,207