DOP094 Improvement in biomarkers in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with vedolizumab: Results from the continuing VERDICT trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Treatment targets in ulcerative colitis (UC) include symptomatic remission, endoscopic remission, and histologic remission. The ongoing VERDICT trial (NCT04259138) aims to determine the optimal treatment target in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC.1,2 Patients follow treatment algorithms involving early use of vedolizumab (VDZ). Here we report biomarker changes (fecal calprotectin [FCP] and C-reactive protein [CRP]) from baseline to weeks 8, 16, 32 and 48. Methods VDZ 300 mg was administered intravenously following a treatment algorithm related to baseline UC treatment until assigned treatment target was reached, with an escalation step between week 16, 32 and 48 as indicated. Treatment targets were as follows: Group 1 (corticosteroid-free [CSF] symptomatic remission), Group 2 (CSF symptomatic remission + CSF endoscopic remission), and Group 3 (CSF symptomatic remission + CSF endoscopic remission + CSF histologic remission, also termed disease clearance). CSF symptomatic remission was defined as Mayo rectal bleeding subscore=0, CSF endoscopic remission was defined as Mayo Endoscopic Score [MES]≤1, and CSF histologic remission was defined as Geboes score<2B.0. Biomarker assessments included FCP and CRP at weeks 8, 16, 32, and 48. Biomarker remission was defined as FCP ≤250 mg/kg and CRP ≤5 mg/l. Results As of 1st October 2024, 672 patients were enrolled, with 185, 222, and 265 patients in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Biomarkers improved from baseline to Week 16 and incrementally through to Week 48 (Table). Mean changes from baseline to Week 48 in FCP in groups 1, 2, and 3 were: -1268.8 mg/kg, -1515.9 mg/kg, and -1230.1 mg/kg (Table). For CRP, mean changes from baseline to Week 48 were -1.5 mg/l (Group 1), -3.4 mg/l (Group 2), and -1.8 mg/l (Group 3). For FCP, mean changes to Week 48 in all 3 groups were greater in bio-exposed than bionaïve patients, whereas mean change in CRP was greater in bio-exposed patients in Group 1 only (Table). In patients who achieved biomarker remission (FCP≤ 250 mg/kg + CRP ≤5 mg/l) at Week 48, the proportions who had met their treatment target were 51.6% (Group 1), 57.1% (Group 2), and 48.6% (Group 3) [Figure]. Higher baseline FCP was associated with lower odds of histologic remission at Week 16, 32, and 48, with corresponding odds ratios (95% CI) for histologic remission per 100 µg/g increase of baseline FCP of 0.89 (0.86, 0.93), 0.89 (0.86, 0.93), and 0.82 (0.76, 0.87). Conclusion Biomarker data from VERDICT shows improvements in FCP and CRP concentrations from baseline to Week 16, with incremental improvements through to Week 48. Almost half or more of all patients who achieved biomarker remission achieved their assigned treatment target. References 1.Jairath et al., 2024. Doi:10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001218 2.Jairath et al., 2024. Doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0051 Funding The VERDICT trial is a collaborative study between Alimentiv and Takeda. Acknowledgements We thank the patients who participated in the trial, their caregivers, and the study investigators and members of the VERDICT study team. Medical writing support was provided by Paul Hassan, PhD, of Envision Pharma Group, and was funded by Takeda.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».