MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406705158 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae190.0133

DOP094 Improvement in biomarkers in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with vedolizumab: Results from the continuing VERDICT trial

2025· article· en· W4406705158 on OpenAlexaff
Vipul Jairath, Peter Bossuyt, Séverine Vermeire, Guangyong Zou, Shashi Adsul, Jean‐Frédéric Colombel, Geert D’Haens, M Freire, Gordon W. Moran, Shaji Sebastian, Simon Travis, Jurij Hanžel, Christopher Ma, Rocío Sedaño, G Radulescu, P. Sheridan, N Arya, M Beaton, Silvio Danese, Daniel J. Green, M Horynski, Jarosław Kierkuś, Adam Kopoń, Maria Kłopocka, Fernando Magro, Rima Petronienė, M S Silverberg, Ł Wolański, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, Brian G. Feagan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsBarrie Urology GroupUniversity of CalgaryWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVedolizumabMedicineUlcerative colitisVerdictInternal medicineGastroenterologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Treatment targets in ulcerative colitis (UC) include symptomatic remission, endoscopic remission, and histologic remission. The ongoing VERDICT trial (NCT04259138) aims to determine the optimal treatment target in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC.1,2 Patients follow treatment algorithms involving early use of vedolizumab (VDZ). Here we report biomarker changes (fecal calprotectin [FCP] and C-reactive protein [CRP]) from baseline to weeks 8, 16, 32 and 48. Methods VDZ 300 mg was administered intravenously following a treatment algorithm related to baseline UC treatment until assigned treatment target was reached, with an escalation step between week 16, 32 and 48 as indicated. Treatment targets were as follows: Group 1 (corticosteroid-free [CSF] symptomatic remission), Group 2 (CSF symptomatic remission + CSF endoscopic remission), and Group 3 (CSF symptomatic remission + CSF endoscopic remission + CSF histologic remission, also termed disease clearance). CSF symptomatic remission was defined as Mayo rectal bleeding subscore=0, CSF endoscopic remission was defined as Mayo Endoscopic Score [MES]≤1, and CSF histologic remission was defined as Geboes score<2B.0. Biomarker assessments included FCP and CRP at weeks 8, 16, 32, and 48. Biomarker remission was defined as FCP ≤250 mg/kg and CRP ≤5 mg/l. Results As of 1st October 2024, 672 patients were enrolled, with 185, 222, and 265 patients in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Biomarkers improved from baseline to Week 16 and incrementally through to Week 48 (Table). Mean changes from baseline to Week 48 in FCP in groups 1, 2, and 3 were: -1268.8 mg/kg, -1515.9 mg/kg, and -1230.1 mg/kg (Table). For CRP, mean changes from baseline to Week 48 were -1.5 mg/l (Group 1), -3.4 mg/l (Group 2), and -1.8 mg/l (Group 3). For FCP, mean changes to Week 48 in all 3 groups were greater in bio-exposed than bionaïve patients, whereas mean change in CRP was greater in bio-exposed patients in Group 1 only (Table). In patients who achieved biomarker remission (FCP≤ 250 mg/kg + CRP ≤5 mg/l) at Week 48, the proportions who had met their treatment target were 51.6% (Group 1), 57.1% (Group 2), and 48.6% (Group 3) [Figure]. Higher baseline FCP was associated with lower odds of histologic remission at Week 16, 32, and 48, with corresponding odds ratios (95% CI) for histologic remission per 100 µg/g increase of baseline FCP of 0.89 (0.86, 0.93), 0.89 (0.86, 0.93), and 0.82 (0.76, 0.87). Conclusion Biomarker data from VERDICT shows improvements in FCP and CRP concentrations from baseline to Week 16, with incremental improvements through to Week 48. Almost half or more of all patients who achieved biomarker remission achieved their assigned treatment target. References 1.Jairath et al., 2024. Doi:10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001218 2.Jairath et al., 2024. Doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0051 Funding The VERDICT trial is a collaborative study between Alimentiv and Takeda. Acknowledgements We thank the patients who participated in the trial, their caregivers, and the study investigators and members of the VERDICT study team. Medical writing support was provided by Paul Hassan, PhD, of Envision Pharma Group, and was funded by Takeda.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→