DOP085 Higher clinical remission and endoscopic response with vedolizumab in early versus late Crohn’s disease: data from the LOVE-CD trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background In clinical practice, vedolizumab (VDZ) is often considered a slow acting agent in Crohn’s disease (CD). However, a post-hoc analysis of the GEMINI trials revealed, that patients previously exposed to anti-TNF therapy already experienced less diarrhoea and abdominal pain already after respectively 2 and 4 weeks of VDZ treatment.1,2 We evaluated the rapidity of clinical and endoscopic benefit of VDZ treatment in the prospective, open-label LOVE-CD trial conducted in Belgium, the Netherlands and Hungary.3 Methods In the LOVE-CD trial, early and late CD patients with moderate-severe active CD (Crohn’s Disease Activity Index [CDAI] 220-450 and presence of ulcers at baseline endoscopy) received intravenous VDZ over a 52-week period. Early CD was defined as a diagnosis <24 months (treatment-naïve or prior corticosteroid and/or immunomodulator use), and late CD >24 months with prior anti-TNF exposure (and corticosteroids and/or immunomodulator use). Corticosteroids were tapered mandatorily and had to be discontinued by week 26. At every study visit, clinical remission (defined as a CDAI ≤150) and steroid-free clinical remission (no corticosteroids and CDAI ≤150) were calculated. At baseline, week 26 and week 52 an endoscopy was performed with independent scoring. Endoscopic response was defined as a reduction in SES-CD score of ≥50% compared to baseline. Missing data were imputed as non-responders. Results In total, 86 early CD patients and 174 late CD patients were included in the LOVE-CD trial. Baseline median CDAI and SES-CD were similar between the early and late group (255 [IQR 236-287] vs. 259 [235-315] and 9 [6-17] vs. 12 [7-17], resp.). Patients in the early group were younger and had evidently shorter disease duration compared to the late CD group (median age 30 [24-45] vs 36 [28-48] years old, median disease duration 0 [IQR 0-1] vs 11 [6-16] years, resp.). From week 6 onward, clinical remission was reached in a significantly higher proportion of early CD than late CD patients. At week 14, more than half of patients with early CD were in clinical remission, compared to 31% in the late CD group (p<0.001) (Table 1). Week 14 corticosteroid free clinical remission results were comparable (47.7% vs 27.6%, p=0.001) (Figure 1A). The proportion of patients with an endoscopic response was significantly higher in the early CD group compared to the late CD group at week 26 (64% vs 34.5%, p<0.001) and at week 52 (57% vs 35.6%, p=0.001) (Figure 1B). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusion Vedolizumab induced (steroid-free) clinical remission and endoscopic response more often in early than in late CD. Based on these observations, vedolizumab may be considered as a potential first line treatment for CD patients. References 1.Sandborn, et al. (2013). Vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for Crohn's disease. The New England journal of medicine, 369(8), 711–721. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1215739 2.Feagan, et al. (2019). Rapid Response to Vedolizumab Therapy in Biologic-Naive Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 17(1), 130–138.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.026 3.D’Haens et al (2024). Vedolizumab treatment is more effective and safer in early versus late Crohn’s Disease: final results of the LOVE-CD trial. United European Gastroenterology Week, OP 2677.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».