DOP085 Higher clinical remission and endoscopic response with vedolizumab in early versus late Crohn’s disease: data from the LOVE-CD trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background In clinical practice, vedolizumab (VDZ) is often considered a slow acting agent in Crohn’s disease (CD). However, a post-hoc analysis of the GEMINI trials revealed, that patients previously exposed to anti-TNF therapy already experienced less diarrhoea and abdominal pain already after respectively 2 and 4 weeks of VDZ treatment.1,2 We evaluated the rapidity of clinical and endoscopic benefit of VDZ treatment in the prospective, open-label LOVE-CD trial conducted in Belgium, the Netherlands and Hungary.3 Methods In the LOVE-CD trial, early and late CD patients with moderate-severe active CD (Crohn’s Disease Activity Index [CDAI] 220-450 and presence of ulcers at baseline endoscopy) received intravenous VDZ over a 52-week period. Early CD was defined as a diagnosis <24 months (treatment-naïve or prior corticosteroid and/or immunomodulator use), and late CD >24 months with prior anti-TNF exposure (and corticosteroids and/or immunomodulator use). Corticosteroids were tapered mandatorily and had to be discontinued by week 26. At every study visit, clinical remission (defined as a CDAI ≤150) and steroid-free clinical remission (no corticosteroids and CDAI ≤150) were calculated. At baseline, week 26 and week 52 an endoscopy was performed with independent scoring. Endoscopic response was defined as a reduction in SES-CD score of ≥50% compared to baseline. Missing data were imputed as non-responders. Results In total, 86 early CD patients and 174 late CD patients were included in the LOVE-CD trial. Baseline median CDAI and SES-CD were similar between the early and late group (255 [IQR 236-287] vs. 259 [235-315] and 9 [6-17] vs. 12 [7-17], resp.). Patients in the early group were younger and had evidently shorter disease duration compared to the late CD group (median age 30 [24-45] vs 36 [28-48] years old, median disease duration 0 [IQR 0-1] vs 11 [6-16] years, resp.). From week 6 onward, clinical remission was reached in a significantly higher proportion of early CD than late CD patients. At week 14, more than half of patients with early CD were in clinical remission, compared to 31% in the late CD group (p<0.001) (Table 1). Week 14 corticosteroid free clinical remission results were comparable (47.7% vs 27.6%, p=0.001) (Figure 1A). The proportion of patients with an endoscopic response was significantly higher in the early CD group compared to the late CD group at week 26 (64% vs 34.5%, p<0.001) and at week 52 (57% vs 35.6%, p=0.001) (Figure 1B). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusion Vedolizumab induced (steroid-free) clinical remission and endoscopic response more often in early than in late CD. Based on these observations, vedolizumab may be considered as a potential first line treatment for CD patients. References 1.Sandborn, et al. (2013). Vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for Crohn's disease. The New England journal of medicine, 369(8), 711–721. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1215739 2.Feagan, et al. (2019). Rapid Response to Vedolizumab Therapy in Biologic-Naive Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 17(1), 130–138.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.026 3.D’Haens et al (2024). Vedolizumab treatment is more effective and safer in early versus late Crohn’s Disease: final results of the LOVE-CD trial. United European Gastroenterology Week, OP 2677.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".