OP40 Duvakitug (TEV-48574), an anti-TL1a monoclonal antibody, demonstrates efficacy and favourable safety as an induction treatment in adults with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease: results from a phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging, basket trial (RELIEVE UCCD)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Duvakitug is a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that inhibits TL1A binding to DR3, a key driver of inflammation and fibrosis. In comparison, it has less binding selectivity for DcR3, which regulates excess TL1A, maintaining homeostasis. Duvakitug has demonstrated reduced inflammation and fibrosis in colitis animal models.1 Few data are available for the potential of anti-TL1A therapies in Crohn’s disease (CD). A phase 2b induction basket trial (NCT05499130)2 assessed the efficacy, safety and tolerability of duvakitug in adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis and CD. Methods RELIEVE UCCD was a randomised, placebo (PBO)-controlled, double-blind induction study. The CD cohort comprised of adults with moderately to severely active disease with documented inadequate response, loss of response or intolerance to conventional and/or advanced therapies (ATs). Patients were randomised to receive subcutaneously a 2250 mg loading dose of duvakitug or PBO, followed by either duvakitug 450 mg, 900 mg or PBO (1:1:1; stratified by prior AT) every 2 weeks.2 Primary endpoint was endoscopic response (≥50% reduction from baseline in Simple Endoscopic Score for CD [SES-CD]) at week 14. Safety and tolerability were assessed by adverse event (AE) reporting and laboratory monitoring. Results In total, 138 patients with CD were randomised, treated and included in the analysis (n=46 per arm). Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar across arms (Table 1). Both duvakitug doses achieved the primary endpoint (26% [450 mg], 48% [900 mg] versus 13% [PBO]; PBO-adjusted rates: 13% [450 mg], 35% [900 mg]) with statistically significant endoscopic responses based on the prespecified Bayesian analysis, with a >0.90 posterior probability that each duvakitug dose is superior to PBO. Duvakitug treatment effect was observed in both AT-experienced and -naïve patients (Table 2). AE incidence was similar for duvakitug 900 mg (43%) and PBO (48%), and lower than duvakitug 450 mg (67%). Incidences of AEs leading to discontinuation were 2% each for duvakitug 900 mg and PBO, and 9% for duvakitug 450 mg. Conclusion These are the first data reported for a double-blind, randomised, PBO-controlled induction study of an anti-TL1A antibody in patients with CD. Duvakitug demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful endoscopic response versus PBO with no emergent safety signals observed. These results support further development of duvakitug as a treatment option for patients with moderately to severely active CD. Funding Duvakitug is being developed in partnership between Teva and Sanofi. References 1. Clarke AW, et al. MAbs. 2018;10:664–77. 2. Reinisch W, et al. 19th Congress of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organization (ECCO) 2024; 21–24 February 2024; Stockholm, Sweden. Abstract P998.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».