Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This volume of Onoma is themed "American Onomastics," and in our CFP, my co-guest editors and I described the theme as the study of names found anywhere in the Western Hemisphere, or as any study of names by scholars from this part of the world.We received nineteen proposals, encouraged fourteen to submit first drafts, and have chosen eleven to include in this volume.We have made no effort to showcase research representing any particular country, region, type of topic, or method of analysis.Many countries in our part of the world lack representation here, even though we know of significant research and scholars (e.g., in Canada).However, the scholars presented here answered our call, and their articles have been praised by at least two independent reviewers.It may be observed that three of the authors come from outside the Western Hemisphere, and yet their research focuses on names somewhere in this region.Thus, the diverse nationalities of these eleven authors illustrate the increasing reach of research enabled by the Internet.As presented here, these articles fall into four general categories of onomastic research distinguished by the types of things named: Anthroponomastics, Toponomastics, Zoonomastics, and Ergonomastics.Not surprisingly, most of the articles (6) are about anthroponyms, the names of people or groups of people.Three articles are about toponyms, commonly referred to as place names.One article is about pet names (the field of zoonymy), and one is about a product name (the name of a major league baseball team).No article is included here in the field of Literary Onomastics, even though we know of current work in this area.All of the articles reflect the dynamic relationship between names and culture.Grammatically speaking, the common nouns of a language refer (as signs) to categories of things understood within a culture, and names refer to specific items understood by individuals and/or groups within a culture.While my friends and I may understand the name Fido to refer to a specific dog, we also understand Fido to be among the things generally understood as dogs.So too the names of people, places, pets, and products identify specific items that are familiar to others within a specific cultural context.That is to say, people give names, and so names are rooted in cultural contexts in which the people live.Thus, culture affects names, and names reflect culture.This relationship is especially clear in our first article.Yolanda Lpez Franco and Rosales Novoa show how the patterns of baby names have changed differently in two Spanish-speaking communities, Santiago, Cuba and Tlalnepantla, Mexico.As the cultures of these communities have changed, the patterns of baby names have also changed, and they have changed in different ways.Traditionally, Spanish baby names have come from the names of saints
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».