MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406929761 · doi:10.34158/onoma.59/2024/1

Introduction

2024· article· en· W4406929761 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Grant Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueOnoma · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This volume of Onoma is themed "American Onomastics," and in our CFP, my co-guest editors and I described the theme as the study of names found anywhere in the Western Hemisphere, or as any study of names by scholars from this part of the world.We received nineteen proposals, encouraged fourteen to submit first drafts, and have chosen eleven to include in this volume.We have made no effort to showcase research representing any particular country, region, type of topic, or method of analysis.Many countries in our part of the world lack representation here, even though we know of significant research and scholars (e.g., in Canada).However, the scholars presented here answered our call, and their articles have been praised by at least two independent reviewers.It may be observed that three of the authors come from outside the Western Hemisphere, and yet their research focuses on names somewhere in this region.Thus, the diverse nationalities of these eleven authors illustrate the increasing reach of research enabled by the Internet.As presented here, these articles fall into four general categories of onomastic research distinguished by the types of things named: Anthroponomastics, Toponomastics, Zoonomastics, and Ergonomastics.Not surprisingly, most of the articles (6) are about anthroponyms, the names of people or groups of people.Three articles are about toponyms, commonly referred to as place names.One article is about pet names (the field of zoonymy), and one is about a product name (the name of a major league baseball team).No article is included here in the field of Literary Onomastics, even though we know of current work in this area.All of the articles reflect the dynamic relationship between names and culture.Grammatically speaking, the common nouns of a language refer (as signs) to categories of things understood within a culture, and names refer to specific items understood by individuals and/or groups within a culture.While my friends and I may understand the name Fido to refer to a specific dog, we also understand Fido to be among the things generally understood as dogs.So too the names of people, places, pets, and products identify specific items that are familiar to others within a specific cultural context.That is to say, people give names, and so names are rooted in cultural contexts in which the people live.Thus, culture affects names, and names reflect culture.This relationship is especially clear in our first article.Yolanda Lpez Franco and Rosales Novoa show how the patterns of baby names have changed differently in two Spanish-speaking communities, Santiago, Cuba and Tlalnepantla, Mexico.As the cultures of these communities have changed, the patterns of baby names have also changed, and they have changed in different ways.Traditionally, Spanish baby names have come from the names of saints

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOnomaSame topicNames, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchFrench-language works237,207