Multi-contrast machine learning improves schistosomiasis diagnostic performance
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Schistosomiasis currently affects over 250 million people and remains a public health burden despite ongoing global control efforts. Conventional microscopy is a practical tool for diagnosis and screening of Schistosoma haematobium , but identification of eggs requires a skilled microscopist. Here we present a machine learning (ML)-based strategy for automated detection of S. haematobium that combines two imaging contrasts, brightfield (BF) and darkfield (DF), to improve diagnostic performance. We collected BF and DF images of S. haematobium eggs in patient samples from two different field studies in Côte d’Ivoire using a mobile phone-based microscope, the SchistoScope. We then trained separate egg-detection ML models and compared the patient-level performance of BF and DF models alone to Boolean combinations of BF and DF models, using annotations from trained microscopists as the gold standard. We found that models trained on DF images, and almost all BF and DF combinations, performed significantly better than models trained on BF images only. When models were trained on images from the first field study, patient-level classification performance for images from the second study met the WHO Diagnostic Target Product Profile (TPP) sensitivity and specificity for the monitoring and evaluation use case. When we used images from both field studies for the training set, performance of the models was improved. This work shows that multi-contrast imaging can increase information available for classification tasks, while retaining the portability, power, and time-to-results of the TPP’s desired diagnostic. The imaging contrasts used here require no additional sample preparation and do not increase the complexity of the imaging system, and we used off-the-shelf ML models to simplify software engineering. Multi-contrast machine learning offers a practical means to improve performance of automated diagnostics for S. haematobium , one that could be applied to other microscopy-based diagnostics. Author summary Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease that impacts hundreds of millions of people worldwide. Patients with Schistosoma haematobium shed parasite eggs in their urine, which can be used as a diagnostic marker of disease. However, identification of those eggs in patient samples normally requires a microscope and trained microscopist. In this work, we show that machine learning models trained on two imaging contrasts, brightfield and darkfield, can improve performance of automated schistosomiasis diagnosis. Using a mobile phone-based microscope (the SchistoScope), we captured brightfield and darkfield images of patient samples during two visits to Côte d’Ivoire and then trained models to detect eggs in the brightfield and darkfield images. When training on images from one visit and testing on images from the other visit, we find that combining the brightfield and darkfield model outputs improved the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity compared to brightfield alone, meeting the target metrics for monitoring and evaluation of schistosomiasis control programs outlined by the World Health Organization. This use of multi-contrast machine learning with a mobile microscope has the potential to improve diagnostic testing for schistosomiasis and could be extended to other neglected tropical diseases.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».