MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407023932 · doi:10.1101/2025.01.30.25321353

Multi-contrast machine learning improves schistosomiasis diagnostic performance

2025· preprint· en· W4407023932 on OpenAlexaff
María Díaz de León Derby, Charles B. Delahunt, Ethan Spencer, Jean T. Coulibaly, Kigbafori D. Silué, Isaac I. Bogoch, Anne-Laure Le Ny, Daniel A. Fletcher

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasites and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContrast (vision)SchistosomiasisComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMedicineImmunologyHelminths

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Schistosomiasis currently affects over 250 million people and remains a public health burden despite ongoing global control efforts. Conventional microscopy is a practical tool for diagnosis and screening of Schistosoma haematobium , but identification of eggs requires a skilled microscopist. Here we present a machine learning (ML)-based strategy for automated detection of S. haematobium that combines two imaging contrasts, brightfield (BF) and darkfield (DF), to improve diagnostic performance. We collected BF and DF images of S. haematobium eggs in patient samples from two different field studies in Côte d’Ivoire using a mobile phone-based microscope, the SchistoScope. We then trained separate egg-detection ML models and compared the patient-level performance of BF and DF models alone to Boolean combinations of BF and DF models, using annotations from trained microscopists as the gold standard. We found that models trained on DF images, and almost all BF and DF combinations, performed significantly better than models trained on BF images only. When models were trained on images from the first field study, patient-level classification performance for images from the second study met the WHO Diagnostic Target Product Profile (TPP) sensitivity and specificity for the monitoring and evaluation use case. When we used images from both field studies for the training set, performance of the models was improved. This work shows that multi-contrast imaging can increase information available for classification tasks, while retaining the portability, power, and time-to-results of the TPP’s desired diagnostic. The imaging contrasts used here require no additional sample preparation and do not increase the complexity of the imaging system, and we used off-the-shelf ML models to simplify software engineering. Multi-contrast machine learning offers a practical means to improve performance of automated diagnostics for S. haematobium , one that could be applied to other microscopy-based diagnostics. Author summary Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease that impacts hundreds of millions of people worldwide. Patients with Schistosoma haematobium shed parasite eggs in their urine, which can be used as a diagnostic marker of disease. However, identification of those eggs in patient samples normally requires a microscope and trained microscopist. In this work, we show that machine learning models trained on two imaging contrasts, brightfield and darkfield, can improve performance of automated schistosomiasis diagnosis. Using a mobile phone-based microscope (the SchistoScope), we captured brightfield and darkfield images of patient samples during two visits to Côte d’Ivoire and then trained models to detect eggs in the brightfield and darkfield images. When training on images from one visit and testing on images from the other visit, we find that combining the brightfield and darkfield model outputs improved the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity compared to brightfield alone, meeting the target metrics for monitoring and evaluation of schistosomiasis control programs outlined by the World Health Organization. This use of multi-contrast machine learning with a mobile microscope has the potential to improve diagnostic testing for schistosomiasis and could be extended to other neglected tropical diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicParasites and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207