Delivering Psychiatric Assessment and Treatment in Low-Resource Settings: A Potential Model for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Developmental Disorders, Psychiatric Morbidity, and Complex Biomedical Multimorbidity
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Addressing life-span neurodevelopmental disorders, psychiatric morbidity, and complex biomedical conditions, in both traditional urban and low-resource settings, requires an integrated, cost-effective, and scalable approach that adapts to local infrastructure and cultural contexts. Many urban and rural communities face shortages of mental health professionals, leading to significant barriers in psychiatric assessment and treatment accessibility. This paper proposes an integrated and sustainable framework. The model incorporates community-based care models, task-shifting strategies, and digital innovations, including AI-assisted diagnostics, telepsychiatry, and wearable health monitoring. The model’s framework is structured around four key pillars: (1) Accessible and Scalable Psychiatric Assessment, (2) A Multi-Tiered Treatment Model, (3) Managing Complex Biomedical Multimorbidity, and (4) Policy and Sustainability Strategies. The implementation strategy follows a tax reform model to direct government tax revenues including those recovered at the community level into mental health infrastructure, workforce training, and digital health solutions. The four-phase approach is modeled a remote community of 100,000 people and includes infrastructure development (Years 1-2), community-based mental health expansion (Years 3-5), AI and digital psychiatry integration (Years 6-8), and full policy implementation (Years 9-10). Each of the models phase integrate evidence-based interventions, including but not limited to task-shifting psychiatric care to community health workers (CHWs), expanding school-based screenings for neurodevelopmental disorders, implementing AI-powered mental health surveillance systems, clinical outcome measurement, and optimizing predictive analytics to allocate resources efficiently. A cost-benefit analysis demonstrates that employing a tax reduction model up to an initial $35 million investment in local health and mental health infrastructure, workforce training, and AI-based psychiatry yields a projected $265 million return over ten years, reflecting a 7.5x return on investment (ROI). The integration of telepsychiatry and AI-driven diagnostics is projected to increase psychiatric consultation rates by 20%, reduce untreated mental illness costs by $10 million annually, and generate $100 million in productivity gains through workforce retention and reduced absenteeism. By embedding health and mental health services within communities via tax reduction with access to tax revenue supported local primary healthcare systems that leverages digital health advancements, this model ensures the long-term sustainability of health and psychiatric care while maximizing economic productivity and social resilience. Through tax incentives, public-private partnerships (PPPs), and innovative financing mechanisms, this approach fosters inclusive, community-led mental health support, reducing the long-term financial burden on government healthcare systems. The findings highlight the potential of a tax-incentivized, technology-driven psychiatric care model to create scalable, self-sustaining, and culturally relevant mental health solutions for underserved populations worldwide. Limitations are noted.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».