Biological Polymers: Evolution, Function, and Significance
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A holistic description of biopolymers and their evolutionary origins will contribute to our understanding of biochemistry, biology, the origins of life, and signatures of life outside our planet. While biopolymer sequences evolve through known Darwinian processes, the origins of the backbones of polypeptides, polynucleotides, and polyglycans are less certain. We frame this topic through two questions: (i) Do the characteristics of biopolymer backbones indicate evolutionary origins? (ii) Are there reasonable mechanistic models of such pre-Darwinian evolutionary processes? To address these questions, we have established criteria to distinguish chemical species produced by evolutionary mechanisms from those formed by nonevolutionary physical, chemical, or geological processes. We compile and evaluate properties shared by all biopolymer backbones rather than isolating a single type. Polypeptide, polynucleotide, and polyglycan backbones are kinetically trapped and thermodynamically unstable in aqueous media. Each biopolymer forms a variety of elaborate assemblies with diverse functions, a phenomenon we call polyfunction. Each backbone changes structure and function upon subtle chemical changes such as the reduction of ribose or a change in the linkage site or stereochemistry of polymerized glucose, a phenomenon we call function-switching. Biopolymers display homo- and heterocomplementarity, enabling atomic-level control of structure and function. Biopolymer backbones access recalcitrant states, where assembly modulates kinetics and thermodynamics of hydrolysis. Biopolymers are emergent; the properties of biological building blocks change significantly upon polymerization. In cells, biopolymers compose mutualistic networks; a cell is an Amazon Jungle of molecules. We conclude that biopolymer backbones exhibit hallmarks of evolution. Neither chemical, physical, nor geological processes can produce molecules consistent with observations. We are faced with the paradox that Darwinian evolution relies on evolved backbones but cannot alter biopolymer backbones. This Darwinian constraint is underlined by the observation that across the tree of life, ribosomes are everywhere and always have been composed of RNA and protein. Our data suggest that chemical species on the Hadean Earth underwent non-Darwinian coevolution driven in part by hydrolytic stress, ultimately leading to biopolymer backbones. We argue that highly evolved biopolymer backbones facilitated a seamless transition from chemical to Darwinian evolution. This model challenges convention, where backbones are products of direct prebiotic synthesis. In conventional models, biopolymer backbones retain vestiges of prebiotic chemistry. Our findings, however, align with models where chemical species underwent iterative and recursive sculpting, selection, and exaptation. This model supports Orgel's "gloomy" prediction that modern biochemistry has discarded vestiges of prebiotic chemistry. But there is hope. We believe an understanding of biopolymer origins will progress during the challenging and exciting integration of chemical sciences and evolutionary theory. These efforts can provide new perspectives on pre-Darwinian mechanisms and can deepen our understanding of evolution and of chemical sciences. Our working definition of chemical evolution is continuous chemical change with exploration of new chemical spaces and avoidance of equilibrium. In alignment with our model, we observe chemical evolution in complex mixtures undergoing wet-dry cycling, which does appear to undergo continuous chemical change and exploration of new chemical spaces while avoiding equilibrium.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle