Biological Polymers: Evolution, Function, and Significance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A holistic description of biopolymers and their evolutionary origins will contribute to our understanding of biochemistry, biology, the origins of life, and signatures of life outside our planet. While biopolymer sequences evolve through known Darwinian processes, the origins of the backbones of polypeptides, polynucleotides, and polyglycans are less certain. We frame this topic through two questions: (i) Do the characteristics of biopolymer backbones indicate evolutionary origins? (ii) Are there reasonable mechanistic models of such pre-Darwinian evolutionary processes? To address these questions, we have established criteria to distinguish chemical species produced by evolutionary mechanisms from those formed by nonevolutionary physical, chemical, or geological processes. We compile and evaluate properties shared by all biopolymer backbones rather than isolating a single type. Polypeptide, polynucleotide, and polyglycan backbones are kinetically trapped and thermodynamically unstable in aqueous media. Each biopolymer forms a variety of elaborate assemblies with diverse functions, a phenomenon we call polyfunction. Each backbone changes structure and function upon subtle chemical changes such as the reduction of ribose or a change in the linkage site or stereochemistry of polymerized glucose, a phenomenon we call function-switching. Biopolymers display homo- and heterocomplementarity, enabling atomic-level control of structure and function. Biopolymer backbones access recalcitrant states, where assembly modulates kinetics and thermodynamics of hydrolysis. Biopolymers are emergent; the properties of biological building blocks change significantly upon polymerization. In cells, biopolymers compose mutualistic networks; a cell is an Amazon Jungle of molecules. We conclude that biopolymer backbones exhibit hallmarks of evolution. Neither chemical, physical, nor geological processes can produce molecules consistent with observations. We are faced with the paradox that Darwinian evolution relies on evolved backbones but cannot alter biopolymer backbones. This Darwinian constraint is underlined by the observation that across the tree of life, ribosomes are everywhere and always have been composed of RNA and protein. Our data suggest that chemical species on the Hadean Earth underwent non-Darwinian coevolution driven in part by hydrolytic stress, ultimately leading to biopolymer backbones. We argue that highly evolved biopolymer backbones facilitated a seamless transition from chemical to Darwinian evolution. This model challenges convention, where backbones are products of direct prebiotic synthesis. In conventional models, biopolymer backbones retain vestiges of prebiotic chemistry. Our findings, however, align with models where chemical species underwent iterative and recursive sculpting, selection, and exaptation. This model supports Orgel's "gloomy" prediction that modern biochemistry has discarded vestiges of prebiotic chemistry. But there is hope. We believe an understanding of biopolymer origins will progress during the challenging and exciting integration of chemical sciences and evolutionary theory. These efforts can provide new perspectives on pre-Darwinian mechanisms and can deepen our understanding of evolution and of chemical sciences. Our working definition of chemical evolution is continuous chemical change with exploration of new chemical spaces and avoidance of equilibrium. In alignment with our model, we observe chemical evolution in complex mixtures undergoing wet-dry cycling, which does appear to undergo continuous chemical change and exploration of new chemical spaces while avoiding equilibrium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it