MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4407165049 · doi:10.1101/2025.02.04.25321451

Association between Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry with mortality and long-term cardiovascular outcomes in Chinese adults

2025· preprint· en· W4407165049 sur OpenAlexafffund
Mengya Li, Yang Li, Mengxin Chen, Duong Mylinh, Qiujing Cai, Biyan Wang, Sumathy Rangarajan, Kai You, Jiying Li, Salim Yusuf, Li Wei, Zhiguang Liu, Bo Hu, Lap Ah Tse

Notice bibliographique

RevuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Établissements canadiensHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Organismes subventionnairesFuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesNational Institutes of HealthNational Children's Research CentreCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchChinese Academy of Medical SciencesHamilton Health SciencesHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
Mots-clésSpirometryMedicineTerm (time)Association (psychology)Internal medicineCardiologyDemographyGerontologyPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background To examine the prevalence and characteristics of PRISm among Chinese individuals, as well as its association with future mortality and cardiovascular (CVD) outcomes. Methods This was a substudy of the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study, which recruited 40,279 individuals aged 35-70 years from 115 urban and rural communities in 12 provinces across China between 2005 and 2009. At baseline, participants were categorized into subgroups based on PRISm, airflow obstruction (AO), and normal spirometry. Follow-up was conducted every three years to obtain information on major cardiovascular events and mortality. Cox frailty proportional hazard regression was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Results The baseline prevalence rates of PRISm, AO and normal spirometry were 29.3%, 8.5%, and 62.2% respectively. Over a median follow-up period of 11.9 years, 2,214 deaths, with 773 attributed to CVD, and 3,507 major CVD events were observed. After adjusting for potential confounders, individuals with PRISm, comparing to those with normal spirometry, exhibited significantly elevated risks of all-cause mortality (HR 1.42, 95%CI [1.29, 1.58]), CVD mortality (HR 1.35, 95%CI [1.14, 1.60]), major CVD events (HR 1.16, 95%CI [1.07, 1.25]), myocardial infarction (HR 1.34, 95%CI [1.15,1.56]), and heart failure (HR 2.02, 95%CI [1.46, 2.79]). Conclusions PRISm, a frequently observed result in spirometry among the general Chinese population, exhibits a substantial association with long-term all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, major CVD events. Further investigation is warranted to comprehensively compared the underlying pathophysiologic connection between PRISm and CVD as well as mortality. What is already known on this topic PRISm is considered a transient state with higher transition rates to both normal and obstructive spirometry, often indicating progression to COPD, which is associated with increased respiratory symptoms, diminished quality of life, and a higher risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Given the limited understanding of PRISm, there are several studies on the association between PRISm and health outcomes have been carried out in different populations since the concept of PRISm was introduced in 2014. Longitudinal studies based on population cohorts such as COPDGene, UK Biobank, Rotterdam, and NHLBI have shown that PRISm is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, with similar results found in a study based on a Japanese population. Lung function differs substantially between races and regions. Most of the existing PRISm-related studies are based on populations in developed countries such as Europe and the United States, and the conclusions of these studies should not be directly generalized to East Asian populations, including China. Currently, there is only two studies based on a Japanese and Korean aimed at exploring the relationship between PRISm and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, but the sample size of these study is relatively small, and the statistical power of the conclusions is relatively limited. What this study adds This is the first longitudinal study examining the association of PRISm with the risk for all-cause mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in a general Chinese population. The results showed that the prevalence of PRISm in the general Chinese population is 29.3%, which is significantly higher than previous studies. Compared to individuals with normal spirometry, the population with baseline PRISm had a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and heart failure (HF), and showed a trend towards higher risk than those with baseline airflow obstruction (AO, although no statistically significant difference was observed). How this study might affect research, practice or policy Our findings support that the early prevention, diagnosis, and intervention of PRISm may offer an important strategy to alleviating the high CVD burden in China.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,029

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,320
Écart entre enseignants0,292 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuemedRxiv→Même sujetChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research→Travaux en français237 207→