Response to Inhaled Nitric Oxide and Mortality Among Very Preterm Neonates With Pulmonary Hypertension
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Importance: Clinical observations of immediate improvement in fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) in a proportion of cases is often cited as the rationale for using inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in the management of acute pulmonary hypertension among very preterm neonates (gestational age, <32 weeks). However, the clinical effectiveness of such a response pattern remains underinvestigated. Objective: To identify factors associated with predischarge mortality among very preterm neonates receiving iNO for acute pulmonary hypertension, with specific a priori emphasis on iNO responsiveness. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective observational cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022, at 12 Canadian tertiary neonatal intensive care units. Consecutive very preterm neonates who received iNO for a diagnosis of acute pulmonary hypertension and pretreatment FiO2 of 0.50 or more were included. Neonates with congenital anomalies or those who were treated for chronic pulmonary hypertension with iNO were excluded. Early acute pulmonary hypertension (≤72 hours of age) and late acute pulmonary hypertension (>72 hours of age) cohorts were analyzed separately. Statistical analysis was performed from January 2023 to January 2024. Exposure: Treatment with iNO for acute pulmonary hypertension. Main Outcomes and Measures: The study cohorts were divided for comparison based on the primary outcome of predischarge mortality. Logistic regression analyses were used with predefined variables, including iNO responsiveness, to identify factors associated with mortality. A positive response to iNO was defined as a pre-iNO minus 4-hour post-iNO FiO2 of 0.20 or more. Results: The early acute pulmonary hypertension group (mean [SD] birth gestational age, 26.3 [2.4] weeks; median treatment age, 1 day [IQR, 1-2 days]; 147 boys [56%]) included 262 neonates; 179 (68%) had a pre-iNO FiO2 of 1.0. The late acute pulmonary hypertension group (mean [SD] birth gestational age, 24.9 [1.7] weeks; median treatment age, 13 days [IQR, 9-20 days]; 72 boys [66%]) included 109 neonates; 51 (47%) had a pre-iNO FiO2 of 1.0. Neonates with early acute pulmonary hypertension more frequently had a positive iNO response (71% [186 of 262] vs 41% [45 of 109]) and lower mortality (34% [90 of 262] vs 49% [53 of 109]) than those with late acute pulmonary hypertension. Accounting for pretreatment illness factors, greater reduction in FiO2 with iNO remained associated with lower mortality for neonates with early acute pulmonary hypertension (adjusted odds ratio per FiO2 reduction of 0.10, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.65-0.84]). For those with late acute pulmonary hypertension, however, only pretreatment illness severity (lower pre-iNO FiO2 and higher pre-iNO pH), and not positive response to iNO (adjusted odds ratio, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.17-1.30]), was associated with mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of very preterm neonates with acute pulmonary hypertension treated with iNO, responsiveness to iNO was associated with improved outcomes during the first 72 hours of age. The prognostic role of iNO response in acute pulmonary hypertension presenting after 72 hours of age remains unclear. Future studies should investigate the distinct pathophysiological mechanisms associated with late acute pulmonary hypertension in this population.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».