Response to Inhaled Nitric Oxide and Mortality Among Very Preterm Neonates With Pulmonary Hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance: Clinical observations of immediate improvement in fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) in a proportion of cases is often cited as the rationale for using inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in the management of acute pulmonary hypertension among very preterm neonates (gestational age, <32 weeks). However, the clinical effectiveness of such a response pattern remains underinvestigated. Objective: To identify factors associated with predischarge mortality among very preterm neonates receiving iNO for acute pulmonary hypertension, with specific a priori emphasis on iNO responsiveness. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective observational cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022, at 12 Canadian tertiary neonatal intensive care units. Consecutive very preterm neonates who received iNO for a diagnosis of acute pulmonary hypertension and pretreatment FiO2 of 0.50 or more were included. Neonates with congenital anomalies or those who were treated for chronic pulmonary hypertension with iNO were excluded. Early acute pulmonary hypertension (≤72 hours of age) and late acute pulmonary hypertension (>72 hours of age) cohorts were analyzed separately. Statistical analysis was performed from January 2023 to January 2024. Exposure: Treatment with iNO for acute pulmonary hypertension. Main Outcomes and Measures: The study cohorts were divided for comparison based on the primary outcome of predischarge mortality. Logistic regression analyses were used with predefined variables, including iNO responsiveness, to identify factors associated with mortality. A positive response to iNO was defined as a pre-iNO minus 4-hour post-iNO FiO2 of 0.20 or more. Results: The early acute pulmonary hypertension group (mean [SD] birth gestational age, 26.3 [2.4] weeks; median treatment age, 1 day [IQR, 1-2 days]; 147 boys [56%]) included 262 neonates; 179 (68%) had a pre-iNO FiO2 of 1.0. The late acute pulmonary hypertension group (mean [SD] birth gestational age, 24.9 [1.7] weeks; median treatment age, 13 days [IQR, 9-20 days]; 72 boys [66%]) included 109 neonates; 51 (47%) had a pre-iNO FiO2 of 1.0. Neonates with early acute pulmonary hypertension more frequently had a positive iNO response (71% [186 of 262] vs 41% [45 of 109]) and lower mortality (34% [90 of 262] vs 49% [53 of 109]) than those with late acute pulmonary hypertension. Accounting for pretreatment illness factors, greater reduction in FiO2 with iNO remained associated with lower mortality for neonates with early acute pulmonary hypertension (adjusted odds ratio per FiO2 reduction of 0.10, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.65-0.84]). For those with late acute pulmonary hypertension, however, only pretreatment illness severity (lower pre-iNO FiO2 and higher pre-iNO pH), and not positive response to iNO (adjusted odds ratio, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.17-1.30]), was associated with mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of very preterm neonates with acute pulmonary hypertension treated with iNO, responsiveness to iNO was associated with improved outcomes during the first 72 hours of age. The prognostic role of iNO response in acute pulmonary hypertension presenting after 72 hours of age remains unclear. Future studies should investigate the distinct pathophysiological mechanisms associated with late acute pulmonary hypertension in this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".