Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Since the birth of the first baby conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF) in the UK in 1978, millions of people around the world have built their families using fertility treatments. One in six people of reproductive age worldwide experience infertility in their lifetime. That statistic does not account for single parents by choice, for 2SLGBTQI+ couples wanting to have children, or for those who require fertility preservation for medical reasons (such as a cancer diagnosis), who will need fertility care to form their families. Although it is often the only option for those who want to have children and can’t by other means, fertility care is expensive, making it inaccessible to many. The average, upfront out-of-pocket cost of one round of IVF in Canada is between $10,000 and $20,000, including medication. IVF with a donor embryo costs approximately $30,000 and surrogacy costs range from $80,000 to $100,000. In an effort to ensure people in Canada can access fertility care, the federal and some provincial governments have created measures, provided public funding, and established parentage laws. There is no national fertility funding strategy and three provinces (Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia) and the three territories are without any public funding for fertility care (as of January 2025). Access to fertility care varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, financially as well as geographically. Many residents are required to travel out of province to receive these treatments, which adds to the cost. The Assisted Human Reproduction Act is a federal act that regulates the administration of fertility treatments across provinces and territories. This report provides an overview of the principles that the Government of Canada abides by when creating such regulations. These are followed by a set of prohibitions and regulations surrounding consent and reimbursements. Finally, since many parties may be involved in fertility treatment, steps have been taken to protect the rights of all parties, including the intended parents, donors of reproductive materials, surrogate mothers, and the children being born. As such, most provinces and territories have established acts that determine the legal parents at birth as well as the process to become a legal parent of a child born by fertility treatments. These laws vary across jurisdictions, with some requiring a court order to change parentage, while others do not even recognize surrogacy. This report allows readers to form a better understanding of the fertility treatments, policies, and provincial subsidies available in Canada. Fertility treatments continue to evolve. As new discoveries are made, it is important to discuss and consider the potential policy changes that might be needed to accommodate this evolution in technology.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,048 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».